From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8086789 for ; Thu, 1 May 2014 23:15:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id cc10so1421246wib.14 for ; Thu, 01 May 2014 14:15:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=1H1lqak/eJ5sT8MARqF5PkElvBE59y4KPv1CCYN3RyQ=; b=OXhXeGGcCArQxfSu2UInKGARCMXBqb906Xr3PpWVutkyleG+pGLGZiHwFuUVctAQvh R6LxfI7MNERAbVoBonwcgVM2ySQLgTJhe4IuSZjpAjlodrRr1OWXAT01Ur91BGhL1bEa YihcE5Je2NnzqM6M4AOYZ6Kbzq7BRZY1H8QV4hHX6z4/mRaarxouYZ2M52NtFFFmEKD1 BGOyeWieWAUA78ajBZL9qpm8xqbKfuAyXFXhNmORBGcdazBqqeK80YG/3fnsYVG2sa7t gJHryR1ibrzMqhdW9VYt/EQ97cEzAdEis62lw6764YRIIGsmqeqw+waus4jxzmScdNki yRpA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmlseXGe0NCPBQP0giHtQhoSgyLNWYAN6Pz1n/yLX/dbWY4zKTXEpFb4KovzIQrhXbcLnSG X-Received: by 10.180.206.36 with SMTP id ll4mr3643609wic.57.1398978919638; Thu, 01 May 2014 14:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (abo-213-55-68.mts.modulonet.fr. [85.68.55.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm330728wia.7.2014.05.01.14.15.17 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 May 2014 14:15:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Neil Horman Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 23:15:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1872219.v7nppFMGS2@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.13 (Linux/3.14.1-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20140501131410.GC14521@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <1398818805-18834-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <20140501131410.GC14521@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 21:15:15 -0000 2014-05-01 09:14, Neil Horman: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:46:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK > > for RPM-based distributions. > > > > The file naming currently doesn't allow to install different DPDK > > versions. > > But the packaging naming should be ready to manage different DPDK versions > > > > having different API/ABI for different applications: > > - dpdk-core has full version in its name to manage API breaking > > - extensions have a number as name suffix to manage PMD API breaking. > > > > When API/ABI will be stable, package names could be simpler. > > > > I suggest to add these .spec files as a starting point for integration > > in Linux distributions. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - name of .spec file match package name > > - version in package name > > - no static library > > - ldconfig/depmod in scriplets > > > > Thanks for your comments/reviews. > > I understand that this is holding up the 1.6.0r2 release, as well as the > 1.7.0 integration. As such, given that my concerns, while valid IMO, > aren't required for the release: > > Acked-by: Neil Horman Applied for dpdk-1.6.0r2, memnic-1.1, vmxnet3-usermap 1.2 and virtio-net-pmd-1.2. Thanks Neil and other RedHat people for helping in this first step. -- Thomas