From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D744CA9; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:39:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055E021144; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:39:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:39:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=C0+OgwOZNYmpq+/fLQ8W9On3cDM1A2lrbNvQuXPUh48=; b=HKnJlbYbfGde hdCfLMdKIX+z14wKEhspklpCnO1Y0PWxFFTRuxame40yJyRp+N0tZrqckxQfhNz0 GPP1itbg9O6xi3qiL4Og7dx0z92tR0EeSWK0odS3s+omMgKw/n/uFjpIziXrTURN ZHSoafgl2QDRnsUEp79pgMeYZR/daM4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=C0+OgwOZNYmpq+/fLQ8W9On3cDM1A2lrbNvQuXPUh 48=; b=GoCYKH3g5F5h+kuI+wRLCNnsP0S+G7mr1hwMYoy3wLUDPV9+RQqpEr5dT E7XsruVIv1WxMe5OmZqKkyv2lakqGezWqEplUz8mf/idjqNw3q2o5GsUow8wJVmf glpAA/jAABeMT1Z4CwZPFNFzOSPXoV46XVSKmTUHAkviveTKYxjO1vFnO9FDyjUz P3BKCzXXf0/nLTRvjBcpGSwBLYGTbiAGIvBL0K6OkMY2JV941ZKHl0Xy1gf709jf Hv11CFhTMemdVwVnZJU41NQ2MJcAyDl+Yoll8UYj+51SFSxSF8FSjNm/0uEnCwZA U8CRBAUfUdZp+sjHCXaGbH1HQA3dQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D9F0D102E0; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:39:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com" , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "stable@dpdk.org" , Ola Liljedahl , olivier.matz@6wind.com, chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:39:58 +0200 Message-ID: <1874944.OrACW1nkDZ@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1537172244-64874-2-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> <1539757786-226178-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 14:39:54 -0000 17/10/2018 08:35, Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China): > Hi Jerin > > As the 1st one of the 3-patch set was not concluded, I submit this 2-patch series to unblock the merge. The thread is totally messed up because: - there is no cover letter - some different series (testpmd, i40e and doc) are in the same thread - v4 replies to a different series - this version should be a v5 but has no number - this version replies to the v3 - patchwork still shows v3 and "v5" - replies from Ola are not quoting previous discussion Because of all of this, it is really difficult to follow. This is probably the reason of the lack of review outside of Arm. One more issue: you must Cc the relevant maintainers. Here: - Olivier for rte_ring - Chao for IBM platform - Bruce and Konstantin for x86 Guys, it is really cool to have more Arm developpers in DPDK. But please consider better formatting your discussions, it is really important in our contribution workflow. I don't know what to do. I suggest to wait for more feedbacks and integrate it in -rc2.