From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com (mail-wg0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1A6B0C0 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:18:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b13so4446243wgh.2 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:19:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=Y0Tav0J8a+fqtoMTOG92aMpUe+LeKahJB8Do5mY3qWs=; b=ITTf8q8EJa1ch1dmws3RIxc8q5P1YR38008yR4QZBP/oj+4QgfoaWeVx24zVwoH7p8 EPoyov0s44n3741vfO1W8DwMQv5u5k51W11mR5ZbBpnTwA8bkmOoNrQOouvcw+e63hZm wJSCfLsSi98ApBrjODsE2YNvFUW68LuBM5dhxXIDSLWgNKCxX4ltYl8jK9O/Dj2n6emr 29y/wT9ULLDxUErTUCC8Rut7t4CLjV6bwJuPEg4AhZhfeV1LQVGDC9yKwAZoT5mqYYWD dWWW0IfJcXppk9R1h+kO/DuV6QzVIoK63+3RO7M/YMJNpz2uLv/7R5acD+WdALMiUYId 6frA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmjoVC8x729aGebNkcCQoAD6KVlnAfAulU7g51K7myWkYUyjqYYrNJYuh4nMddFqf7cW9LO X-Received: by 10.180.228.39 with SMTP id sf7mr46987706wic.26.1402503539706; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id do5sm28125727wib.16.2014.06.11.09.18.58 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:18:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Helmut Sim Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:18:59 +0200 Message-ID: <1879872.RfA1LW5PMu@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.13.1 (Linux/3.14.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.1; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] eth dev doesn't free mbufs for 82575EB X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:18:48 -0000 2014-05-30 15:44, Helmut Sim: > I am trying to verify that the 82575EB NIC functions well. > The file rte_pci_dev_ids.h includes the following lines: > > #ifdef RTE_PCI_DEV_USE_82575EB_COPPER > RTE_PCI_DEV_ID_DECL_IGB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_82575EB_COPPER) > #endif > > so I defined the RTE_PCI_DEV_USE_82575EB_COPPER and hoped it will work well. This commit could interest you: http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=cc333208d5658fea6420 -- Thomas