From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A119B8F9B for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:32:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b14so140805723wmb.1 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:32:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=FnJ7vf/iADGbkEso196f1/OIvBErZ/ZsMnfw70OaRjM=; b=Vx3mzzsi4mg4UgMW6lvr54jFRKc9y+cSuSEUSY+o8B7L0dXjnoK6AYyZ+Q9VfBPhkg wq6yZ5wdEqC/Gt4tWdMFZ0GlA2ttzfiPPuzRHyGgh48YIlC2F9jPPOUB0ZHfbhmBne4G b74Z9/JcaDlVG8RnNtVW0PyO+OhvZZkVK0pcGM/h2SPmIZQlXnO2KKw/ASZUNjsztbIh +8AUuEVxvRZTuIYZ6ryilKZxSRE04P7naKDFkva+C4KDio2pvZMPHF5W4N3GyIINcF28 bWyJtXUTgA/fif1nJq41onTXhLbTzTNSxXYaIyfMN5D++z6rP1jXlMOcTKmU7bXjSqJF TXdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=FnJ7vf/iADGbkEso196f1/OIvBErZ/ZsMnfw70OaRjM=; b=TuDREfsv76eJgYk30gvG6Voc79RoKtha4TCqpm7NGELW52iXQcktTbX/zcLdduGzyS SCbsLwLOl/VIVwO0Yx+Q6PEYPiO1ntwjbpo0Upq4haRk1TbtGJ8Gh8fVpAQvAvPe+AgD in1T1tBhOYhHLuobWoaxW6UBRGX4o5Vq7HSqUtqtoIP7NGKMd90STScMcv+GCUhR05xm aKGyU+5T83VqtvGiw+ywIt8Oy16SIqe2ViidR7V+pl9F43ZyiS/2uhZhZ2Ub3CE/bpUt 1KuX/hHZawUWios72zizns8ETh40QX5qQQ4s2mc7DwV0cShoFRWwVdZgUveROFlsrNLa KDCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQO5Gqpjxmz7nV8qTQcejx7OdKN9XrWqd3wu5iemj2zD2k2Z3HBbHEK6EvEobnCiw8E X-Received: by 10.194.103.198 with SMTP id fy6mr4804901wjb.48.1453480366485; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:32:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w194sm7786428wmd.0.2016.01.22.08.32.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:32:45 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:31:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1881890.o9IDb9bZGc@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1453478442-23000-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> References: <1453478442-23000-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] slow data path communication between DPDK port and Linux X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:32:46 -0000 Hi Ferruh, Not commenting the implementation, just the method. 2016-01-22 16:00, Ferruh Yigit: > This is slow data path communication implementation based on existing KNI. > Difference is: librte_kni converted into a PMD, kdp kernel module is almost > same except all control path functionality removed and some simplification done. Is there a chance to submit such kernel module on LKML instead of DPDK? We should avoid maintaining some out-of-tree modules.