From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8F0A0C44; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:20:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BF5141C29; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:20:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00765141C28 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:20:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9463F5C019E; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:20:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:20:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= /iZ+oJZPuIXZENxSAm5gZMzxjXZjKk8jiWpHFrxwiK8=; b=unAKG95UodQ7RUl+ YPVwcT1LK8XMIieolwrWq4yY4E2KUIWZZfgxUY1bxnaXNNbc9imN7Z1uip7kzSpT LOau1+JE/Q+Wo2g+r0YGXHUaFdxgFTrUmT27dFa0UugoM6xm22wlWrFqoRewjKy6 s2ha1SOSi/uSH19Vc8Jr9fEZAXTOTlf+zepvHxFUHLF/NAMcnZ9Gg+7Ctd9nv9PY 5cfzvWd7ry65f7ijz7NQXW4d/Wgsbjo8QSfLuGwvXs9sE7BNeRhtm4oqYeZAvfFY haOAcE6Ld4Musu4jQfejRrGXDOZycY6wxcMAeumlNybHpz1Ei5H6DHjn2i7p0m1X b4dFgA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=/iZ+oJZPuIXZENxSAm5gZMzxjXZjKk8jiWpHFrxwi K8=; b=IuaLZKL9t3u1KGs67R0635/mMMFs7xYlfISEs9rMwBxpwtlLDRJOEngxO X9q3hdJ0BlmfoK5fPTjwI2+VFxrwD6ssAxSkgWbTkc6baFHKtZiKDMGcAHg1R6L7 Tt51vF/MGWtWD/jmCY4lI7Hw94G5nWGgXjFFputucNLQDmgvLIa1937B/Q9XdsEx cmQ7OjemVf2eDO63iQFkmHzSiJVE4imcbFSs04l2kHZpknR6awrHh2WW5jFg0Eho 1spPSdNDL5pRy7+OkvRfr6qNJQLJCKYDrgPQjGbW7qEG3GgWmaWmOarwGUc+V+7U 6nZic1UWYkBlvA1jSw25+eDXAaplQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudelhedgudehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeethedtieevhfeigeejleegudefjeehkeekteeuveeiuedvveeu tdejveehveetnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9B85124005E; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:20:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Juraj =?utf-8?B?TGlua2XFoQ==?= , David Marchand Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "mdr@ashroe.eu" , Aaron Conole , Michael Santana , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Bruce Richardson Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:20:03 +0200 Message-ID: <1882583.4QfryVaJDx@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210415163230.22263-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ci: fix ABI reference generation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 16/04/2021 11:17, David Marchand: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:39 AM Juraj Linke=C5=A1 wrote: > > > > > > Stick to a compatible configuration passing -Dmachine=3Ddefault. > > > > > > Note: the breakage was not seen earlier this week as I guess the CI w= orkers are > > > using a cached ABI reference for v20.11. > > > > > > Fixes: 5b3a6ca6fd28 ("build: alias default build as generic") > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand > > > > Reviewed-by: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > > > Do we want to change this back to -Dmachine=3Dgeneric after next releas= e? >=20 > This seems fine to me. If we change back in 21.08, we won't be able to test 21.08 against 20.11 or 21.02, right? Wouldn't be better to wait 21.11?