DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mem: store memory mode flags in shared config
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 11:18:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1885384.20xM5LhNRE@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9eac379-b0d6-b220-2d27-38ec8ce2ee46@intel.com>

04/10/2018 11:17, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 03-Oct-18 11:05 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 20/09/2018 17:41, Anatoly Burakov:
> >> Currently, command-line switches for legacy mem mode or single-file
> >> segments mode are only stored in internal config. This leads to a
> >> situation where these flags have to always match between primary
> >> and secondary, which is bad for usability.
> >>
> >> Fix this by storing these flags in the shared config as well, so
> >> that secondary process can know if the primary was launched in
> >> single-file segments or legacy mem mode.
> >>
> >> This bumps the EAL ABI, however there's an EAL deprecation notice
> >> already in place[1] for a different feature, so that's OK.
> >>
> >> [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/43502/
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Notes:
> >>      v2:
> >>      - Added documentation on ABI break
> >>
> >>   doc/guides/rel_notes/rel_description.rst      |  5 +++++
> > 
> > Removed change in this file (dup of release note).
> > 
> >>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst        |  6 +++++-
> >>   .../common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h        |  4 ++++
> >>   lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile          |  2 +-
> >>   lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c             | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>   lib/librte_eal/meson.build                    |  2 +-
> >>   6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Applied (without extra note), thanks.
> > 
> 
> This will probably break external mem patches due to conflict in release 
> notes. Should i respin?

No, conflicts in release notes are usual. I manage such conflict myself.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-04  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-27 12:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mem: share legacy and single file segments mode with secondaries Anatoly Burakov
2018-09-19  8:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-20 15:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mem: store memory mode flags in shared config Anatoly Burakov
2018-10-03 22:05   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-04  9:17     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-10-04  9:18       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-10-04 10:46         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-05  9:04           ` Burakov, Anatoly

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1885384.20xM5LhNRE@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).