From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07880A04B5; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 17:13:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D961BE3D; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 17:13:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF5D1BDFD for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 17:13:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0535ADA9; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 11:13:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:13:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=t5N5MCedh2oKt8AMPHwURkmO/+nuw6S0esGace1kuEM=; b=HZ2bPEDSQAl4 d8T8t/r6AsznucY1q3qlGanBzYpOjuM+bVdE92H++7gHr9PIBwM1rE8Uny9ocImW g0L0TJ5I7ovcgiNQFaHTn8ddG6S2qr93aUAT6cOoc0+adc66XIgX4cupNaYCyU1r fjFYrOF5kGHVBckbbXKo899v48AVix4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=t5N5MCedh2oKt8AMPHwURkmO/+nuw6S0esGace1ku EM=; b=Iqba88ehkxlYu/zWLXFJdjN1I9t7pOFk4+zWojOaeAbZerJp4atAJg5Vn xbzl74yfh1GKzUCy3RPBlRD6K43fZ+jzIm5WqqQftIt4bPXNp3P3pZzpAyMwh4wJ h9V5pK1fknseoQMks8nlyBOs9HTnfaRg3/vVJKChNGJljELyRt3GCkGDkEy5VX1x aRUK7m1ryLXU4ri82f1Wv9sPYMduka+SCA33zHpyR8xC9i1FtPQAd24sUDai6dKF PIMwqJ3ECXiftl3QbZgNePINH8wFhjw2f3jgEblh83eiMQqRYOxq0DdbPfMoVzwi 5/aZ0RfYQ+2siMh24pR7YJwIDFdPw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudejhedgkeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1C8143060401; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 11:13:29 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Kinsella, Ray" Cc: "Richardson, Bruce" , David Marchand , dev , Neil Horman Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 17:13:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1894184.cZXkvyexap@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20191202145718.16407-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20191202154012.GA34@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 02/12/2019 16:43, Kinsella, Ray: > QQ. > > What do you plan to do then, when you go for longer periods of ABI stability? Very good point Ray! For longer periods it would not mach DPDK version number. So we keep standard scheme of increasing by +1 every quarter? > From: Bruce Richardson > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:29:06PM +0100, David Marchand wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > I would prefer increasing the ABI version to 20.2 for an easy > > > > mapping with code version: > > > > DPDK 19.11 = ABI 20 > > > > libs 19.11 = .so.20.0 > > > > DPDK 20.02 = ABI 20 > > > > libs 20.02 = .so.20.2 > > > > DPDK 20.05 = ABI 20 > > > > libs 20.05 = .so.20.5 > > > > DPDK 20.08 = ABI 20 > > > > libs 20.08 = .so.20.8 > > > > > > > > Opinions? > > > > > > +1 but no strong opinion. > > > > > I like that idea too, though again no strong opinion either way. >