From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Jiawei Wang <jiaweiw@nvidia.com>,
viacheslavo@nvidia.com, orika@nvidia.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, rasland@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] Add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:45:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18e7722d-efeb-d6e9-85b2-4b322a84ad56@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230217154747.12401-1-jiaweiw@nvidia.com>
On 2/17/2023 3:47 PM, Jiawei Wang wrote:
> When multiple ports are aggregated into a single DPDK port,
> (example: Linux bonding, DPDK bonding, failsafe, etc.),
> we want to know which port is used for Rx and Tx.
>
> This patch introduces the new ethdev API
> rte_eth_dev_map_aggr_tx_affinity(), it's used to map a Tx queue
> with an aggregated port of the DPDK port (specified with port_id),
> The affinity is the number of the aggregated port.
> Value 0 means no affinity and traffic could be routed to any
> aggregated port, this is the default current behavior.
>
> The maximum number of affinity is given by rte_eth_dev_count_aggr_ports().
>
> This patch allows to map a Rx queue with an aggregated port by using
> a flow rule. The new item is called RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_AGGR_AFFINITY.
>
> While uses the aggregated affinity as a matching item in the flow rule,
> and sets the same affinity value by call
> rte_eth_dev_map_aggr_tx_affinity(), then the packet can be sent from
> the same port as the receiving one.
> The affinity numbering starts from 1, then trying to match on
> aggr_affinity 0 will result in an error.
>
> RFC: http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20221221102934.13822-1-jiaweiw@nvidia.com/
>
> v7:
> * Remove the -ENOTSUP return value since no need anymore.
> * Use the rte_eth_dev as argument in the internal function.
>
> v6:
> * Update the commit titles.
> * Return 0 by default if dev_ops.count_aggr_ports is not defined.
> * Adds the dev_configure and affinity value checking before call map_aggr_tx_affinity.
> * Update the rte_eth_dev_count_aggr_ports description.
>
> v5:
> * Adds rte_eth_dev_map_aggr_tx_affinity() to map a Tx queue to an aggregated port.
> * Adds rte_eth_dev_count_aggr_ports() to get the number of aggregated ports.
> * Updates the flow item RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_AGGR_AFFINITY.
>
> v4:
> * Rebase the latest code
> * Update new field description
> * Update release release note
> * Reword the commit log to make clear
>
> v3:
> * Update exception rule
> * Update the commit log
> * Add the description for PHY affinity and numbering definition
> * Add the number of physical ports into device info
> * Change the patch order
>
> v2: Update based on the comments
>
> Jiawei Wang (2):
> ethdev: add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports
> ethdev: add flow matching of aggregated port
Series applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221221102934.13822-1-jiaweiw@nvidia.com/>
2023-02-03 5:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] add new PHY affinity in the flow item and Tx queue API Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 5:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: introduce the PHY affinity field in " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 5:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: add PHY affinity match item Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] add new PHY affinity in the flow item and Tx queue API Jiawei Wang
2023-02-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: introduce the PHY affinity field in " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-06 15:29 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-07 9:40 ` Ori Kam
2023-02-09 19:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-10 14:06 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-14 9:38 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-14 10:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-03 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: add PHY affinity match item Jiawei Wang
2023-02-14 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Added support for Tx queue mapping with an aggregated port Jiawei Wang
2023-02-14 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ethdev: introduce the Tx map API for aggregated ports Jiawei Wang
2023-02-15 11:41 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-16 17:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-17 6:45 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-16 17:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 6:44 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 8:24 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-17 9:50 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-14 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] ethdev: add Aggregated affinity match item Jiawei Wang
2023-02-16 17:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-17 6:45 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] ethdev: add " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 12:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 12:56 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-17 12:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 13:05 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 13:41 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 15:03 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-17 15:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] ethdev: add flow matching of aggregated port Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 13:01 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-17 13:07 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2023-02-17 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] ethdev: add " Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] ethdev: add flow matching of aggregated port Jiawei Wang
2023-02-17 16:45 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18e7722d-efeb-d6e9-85b2-4b322a84ad56@amd.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jiaweiw@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).