From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC70FA034E; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:50:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE431D93D; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:50:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9C11D651 for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:50:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280545C01EE; Wed, 27 May 2020 08:50:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 27 May 2020 08:50:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= +93CZB80Xaoej7i9jtwHRb/0LKu2OMSi83RlvzZPIkU=; b=JvPnxUc4B3yLzYtx 8ZIB3V7iufXenx1tFb4/FVG7h2HfJM9VJydWT7d3+mRDClBdv4yRYG6jM/2Mkg5d mTyOy4VsrIJ0LUZjsTdBHDvxHq5iCyVXHraRXgOZKJCpYijqpp7gChh53D5lIR0Q cBaBv4wD2hY0EOkLVylSNtMyfsawljVBIaYDKcGxf9BNewGOuxRmiNAt+obVcTfy BvBn1r761YmLvEuVQ+gqaLIf4S1C80Xy9AZc28w74pzeWWjsBUIodu/H1O6CG7Rx Qs4pHXNQTN9uBur5dECtWKSA4uzx78RQ59vtQmmRW/KhIU4aOpokVR0OxV8N3hGp r1k/wg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=+93CZB80Xaoej7i9jtwHRb/0LKu2OMSi83RlvzZPI kU=; b=Yqdu7DkVvTTs6mvH+NGPJRvTjUXuGd848v984jwT3Wj4xFyS6MmEb/E3D LT0XkeIrJhVSYLP3UkqYbdnNwhiA0UyA3WmbXmkXKemsRQ+5ODCc5GM0D+cvG5UH /ZqvYT8zEEW6zWcZXY7kRjV5l9iofhCv9aPPw94G33kwNtwjCRuUrCUzJNLwpqjF DV9vVOHDNdlV45P3aXsADZSbEAMH9nIn/H9kn0+Lub7eecFWv5iGBMb11+W5VWcz hqjUY/4FBhif9ehV7ee1kMEdsTX6iCyjssAxTl/6V4zSesEwjR7ol4Dt2B5K+wwl yWyiZC3O+inwUIGf5rnelvxny9S5g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddvgedgheduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9F6313280064; Wed, 27 May 2020 08:50:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Fady Bader Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Harini Ramakrishnan , Omar Cardona , Pallavi Kadam , Ranjit Menon , dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com, mdr@ashroe.eu, nhorman@tuxdriver.com Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 14:50:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1906091.XQj0qEek43@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ABI versioning in Windows X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" +Cc more people 27/05/2020 12:41, Fady Bader: > What should we do with the ABI versioning in Windows ? I think there are 2 questions here: 1/ Do we want to maintain ABI compatibility on Windows like we do for Linux and FreeBSD? The decision must be clearly documented. 2/ How do we implement the macros in rte_function_versioning.h for Windows? Something needs to be done, otherwise we cannot compile libraries having some function versioning.