From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4149CA05D3 for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:48:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE435F14; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:48:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408925A44 for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:48:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69483B2; Mon, 20 May 2019 09:48:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 20 May 2019 09:48:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=jVk8OhnVeyZ876X9eN7dG+7s+/hFydqBDCz73Ed3q8g=; b=T1neilEw25OK 7tVkoLezG50Jn1X0ZkaYjre+nEgXWnyOxt3OewYGRxH/lmzXIAdlRscG2te2B8nX voE79NiBuBxsDASc0/mFDDObAfiM+wPm4UCoXg6kAIMGj9nI1ZLzSSUEPnrNYBpG FCOpJ0kZcQgDM0Kb3m9xdD5kLss1Jxc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=jVk8OhnVeyZ876X9eN7dG+7s+/hFydqBDCz73Ed3q 8g=; b=zHBAlDBJZGDL7CzgNyop8Ksy+D7VjznFkBVG4GyWMRU+qu7AF7GsekTZ9 fDPlxDASgO2EdM/rxgwQZ2hDpBNqt0/zpwIeF66AFYLayJ6/q0iokk5jxhGBD6tj 69ihWIHOTJkoBej2oHQyp+fmEuI6N6fwExye/5RcQA3q4hIEElQK7nmgASFHAr+U q5TyDSFZRKFCONJbBr98aa1sLIlwbKP1I/Xl58aMJdwPpYP6K8G0LGAPU8WuwjEI EuaDlmjG1luLEuhyX2dUBgdDdE4euM224+EztenzlcqgBrNX3iE9WHadBBqbV83y h36HFdi3I3T5i8DE/R+j1OaZT5J9Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddruddtkedgieelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuff homhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5EDD38005A; Mon, 20 May 2019 09:48:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit , Nicolas Chautru Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 15:48:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1908163.UiyMM5IP6E@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1557533163-172544-1-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> <13004103.2lCk1yY3B3@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] baseband/fpga_lte_fec: adding driver for FEC on FPGA X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 20/05/2019 15:44, Ferruh Yigit: > On 5/15/2019 9:28 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 14/05/2019 21:45, Nicolas Chautru: > >> +Installation > >> +-------------- > >> + > >> +Section 3 of the DPDK manual provides instuctions on installing and compiling DPDK. The > >> +default set of bbdev compile flags may be found in config/common_base, where for example > >> +the flag to build the FPGA LTE FEC device, ``CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_FPGA_LTE_FEC``, is already > >> +set. It is assumed DPDK has been compiled for an icc 64-bit target using: > >> + > >> +.. code-block:: console > >> + > >> + make install T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-icc > > > > I already said (2 months ago) that requiring icc is not acceptable, > > but I got no reply: > > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-March/126161.html > > > > This PMD doesn't have any dependency to ICC, gcc or clang is as good as any. Good news, so please don't use icc in your example. And you should remove "It is assumed DPDK has been compiled for an icc 64-bit target"