From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1703A32A3 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:16:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CB81C10C; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:16:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946281C0DD for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:16:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D788122189; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:16:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:16:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=SRTu4TO6fzVYhSo4L7FS6qyXdmmRWLgOOnxEegf6S3A=; b=Xfo1zOcuPjj9 4IU+0sVPmxN2pwRY/94e/ghweM7E7MPXglw4CHr3/ewDbbWar7dt7MMChiosXiLH Q311aUUkLj0PRuVhBDnsOe559DhrZ9NJs9fUB1mrdrpqd1011CPEFv/sNsZAxGJW m8hVXF7SYcSMWNS6D4eUKltD6qxOAKY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=SRTu4TO6fzVYhSo4L7FS6qyXdmmRWLgOOnxEegf6S 3A=; b=HnqAEZM4ncGpRf3hYhZJaYCMXiyXi80VTAzIxiFrnBEwyTrb7qWbDoTZ3 YCqlEMLWDvZV9rTafQP+TWk6bAr9t7KYZnhN2DPiL0LhEjPMHRucFTa6CS0In79q NyTFvAs6P4PmBqNqN/GOh2AbtBiLLzPtJetShvDKqHxPWEWITIPorWL7KhVNx95f +sCBdUj3ER/945AsBkqBtCn5fAJHvOrwOSpcCmhVafxTstrXpCpEV3bKv41+UX2h Apb3SMZePlSz78T0iBqut0AEQuq5LosnYHxxwAkWckHOIS564wRkSaeOtVX4T/xI YZNLWLfVkhtK3gmlFE19ouHJ55d8Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrleefgdehudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6CBB78005C; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:16:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand , Ferruh Yigit , Ye Xiaolong Cc: Tianfei zhang , dev Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:16:44 +0200 Message-ID: <1908591.FNZmaogfpl@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20190917222459.19097-1-tianfei.zhang@intel.com> <71ae89af-e271-cb72-dd8f-e6d08aeee6d4@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] raw/ifpga/base: dereference before null check X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 25/10/2019 13:47, David Marchand: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:30 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > > Reviewed-by: Xiaolong Ye > > > > > > Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks. > > > > > > > Should we update the MAINTAINERS file to say that "drivers/raw/ifpga" merges to > > the next-net-intel? > > Thanks, this area is, a bit, gray to me. > So a clarification is welcome. Yes I think it is OK to get raw/ifpga in next-net-intel.