From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9187E5A9B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:40:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wgbgq6 with SMTP id gq6so3648397wgb.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 04:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=mbSpVvdwMwL2T5Y6HzeXQ2gLzxGCRcF7VAUOir9BX40=;
 b=EfSxIAgp414z2SLrUP4e9ih5cZ0Rr+ZNynodMN7zNG8V1t9gwjBd19OSxVGMwOYub0
 ZnpHE5KC+RXSmGNdT/riXm8OAeqYLvcIG9pu6Gc/PMg/PK9nkuv3L17ojvYVnZ+lvsHH
 CuhtezXMmedNjirSpJb3wwydB06ho+1Jiw2/mmis/lCW5Zc7mWAyrFFVNgav/0a1b5xS
 cn+ffC4fK4IGm0DPqu3hxtJ+IW39Q0H2V8/QG9Bw2rrupdxFegx3Du4OF76HEE9eX8g8
 TIB5yiqhIA/3mPq92ASxjrwItPsItwTVHl6pNHiDUUWlPzLPXrgKUr+raJqtogm9FQXV
 brFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlivAh72GloszjFgzzOX/oV55Bvr8dIsDgvcZdf9hLMAQ6Xpbrmwi8aaSFjd2HJ42EDEdF5
X-Received: by 10.194.76.73 with SMTP id i9mr15949312wjw.149.1434022851406;
 Thu, 11 Jun 2015 04:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kc4sm695487wjc.2.2015.06.11.04.40.49
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 11 Jun 2015 04:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:39:54 +0200
Message-ID: <1910067.s2MvseVWWd@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C204A2E551@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <2520130.3p9lvqUWmZ@xps13> <159365803.3qspsHhf2U@xps13>
 <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C204A2E551@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] deadline notice
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:40:51 -0000

2015-06-11 10:04, Iremonger, Bernard:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > Note: [RFC] should be preferred for incomplete patches or trials.
> 
> Should RFC PATCH be retained for v2 and subsequent patches or should RFC be dropped?

If you target an integration of your patch, the RFC keyword must be dropped.