From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6124EA054A; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:12:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB7C42D65; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:12:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1730E427EB for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:12:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623BA5C0190; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:12:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:12:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1669122734; x= 1669209134; bh=mmWypcDaRdICK1/zmnnM6PRz1z65gOKzAznnamuajiA=; b=g +z3B/h0NioN03COaIrv1AriRBZ9cKVz3AYypDGH5wjnPJfhypBrRgwIgAfU2hQeN NU/91GGqJjQts/L0zIDJ91TRqXs+y/iRp7oD0qR7ZiAvD2niUS9bKUS7zd+A+bsR sYUQCbsfLLHq5pDvt9HA9YjEfrJfwm9p6Uc+AC3GBPB3mbP/qs7Kv/8YpgW4eqsU IP3zeBzS/lO4eDYGxokuFppg7soK6w2hEdJK9T+LdeBhhhbOmvbxIo3xzv2OmhkC aqUPJjh/Za+NxrvYyZA+xHk36BaMi1lwqWdqKJxk0mibUYbgab/8KqKkWkxS2j/l L71fNDF7GIpT/EgAAyo/Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1669122734; x= 1669209134; bh=mmWypcDaRdICK1/zmnnM6PRz1z65gOKzAznnamuajiA=; b=q QAG9UpR8Au2boxI1xamUiQGkn0Teq757pBb46SaxcT+vK55/xBM/VZP8u7wYyT6U zRz2EXbf7W52T42K2LRLHzIZFt2bzOYEHsnXd6Wa5heiGDQpW5LCx080Fx/AAq+5 08aCGR5youmCgmEuYnpNSSJ0FQWAxvx2HxJqQ8eHZesiux0IPw2wVnJK2stap35w YemY2eqBM/tTBWhwSMB7Ms6DsRJbP33EzJupCJuF2heAZ5RdY5cLAdfYx11dyH24 j7Z8QgZFBRuOFZ/fRqaC28sVydMAOXP/mXEyXrSPtNQLhTM7Tc+mWMgxRQfWrWO0 1CGciugivMCml3P/SOP/Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvgedrheelgddvtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejieeifeehtdffgfdvleetueeffeehueejgfeuteeftddtieek gfekudehtdfgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:12:12 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: liyi1@chinatelecom.cn Cc: dev@dpdk.org, fanzhang.oss@gmail.com, Maxime Coquelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: fix max supported packet len for virtio driver Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:12:11 +0100 Message-ID: <1922008.yKVeVyVuyW@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20221118012614.4338-1-liyi1@chinatelecom.cn> <20221119082420.199866-1-liyi1@chinatelecom.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 22/11/2022 10:36, Maxime Coquelin: > > On 11/19/22 09:24, liyi1@chinatelecom.cn wrote: > > From: Yi Li > > > > According to VIRTIO_MAX_RX_PKTLEN macro definition, for virtio driver > > currently supported pkt size is 9728. > > > > Fixes: fc1f2750a3ec ("doc: programmers guide") +Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Yi Li > > Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin Applied, thanks.