From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A956B368 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 23:51:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k48so3441553wev.27 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:53:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=i2qgQSnW0nxH7bG4zaAu+bAoaeR9Mt56LcoMikbjIV8=; b=X9eepnYN6r8THYDMnG5H+Si9F6F9U3a1EN9oS41lSMj+NscptZeyjXEzn9XB56ULSe LRos8I9s2a3mHaIe2GGBXZTRoBmOHwp/ZAuZWxf7p2WqELv00CcPkK/Os1fEmI6RTzwh wKYLZ2GbPjsg0SSqJHqleEWgv9h/GOILcGojafV2EjJ+jgmK5pyicRy9MbXX8Wf/acxh 8NlPAV4kxbGpqZvJOsdNsbgYGQEc7eLTm5bKnigpEBswlYraJJa9h/Dqz/tNbm3pYCGY v6CZeXEmTFQmdHUxPfzdt4KmcnPnTgbpEs/LbLng3D8EpMbdskT2Q73n1d8b43/TDReB uAGA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmu7MG5r1j1A/NJauNvvtRYv/wSCUWyEew2oe9lpAu15UX7B6AZTFLT9RG886Eae54S75Il X-Received: by 10.194.57.132 with SMTP id i4mr1495113wjq.6.1406843638854; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f6sm16152398wja.25.2014.07.31.14.53.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:53:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Neil Horman Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 23:53:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1922554.0Xb76TrHgY@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.15.7-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20140731181032.GC20718@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <1406665466-29654-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <20140731143228.GB20718@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20140731181032.GC20718@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] dpdk: Allow for dynamic enablement of some isolated features X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 21:51:57 -0000 2014-07-31 14:10, Neil Horman: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:32:28AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:26:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Please, let's focus on the first item and we could discuss about performance > > > later. Having some different code path choosed at runtime is a big rework and > > > imply changing the compilation model (RFC welcome). > > > > Even if I misinterpreted your statement above, I'm still not sure why your > asserting this. Fixing the build to work with the default target machine is > good, and should be undertaken, and I'll happily do so, but why reject the > solution in front of you to wait for it? I'm not rejecting the solution. Let's try to improve performance of the default build with runtime checks. Seeing patches and benchmarks will be interesting. You're opening a door and I don't know if we'll see the ceiling of this room :) -- Thomas