From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D81E1B1F9; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:27:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F50822400; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 05:27:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 05:27:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=LxhxNX+cpEB4Zippd0jYJgzQCuf3O+FiD2eu1oq0YYs=; b=OPPBsCHGNZRf FM0mgHg6uBKW2sgGCXFWLHORrVh2ZdZCmjEU3PzMCQFrIk3WgDQbPzcPXHL5yeLh ghiJ6+uflOYeNHlDP4F90MW1osohGaguD8RYu605FwFcn581hDhbYZf5IRc/CRkn XnfbjXQol5pyk3zKGzlL5Df2U0Sb4Hg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=LxhxNX+cpEB4Zippd0jYJgzQCuf3O+FiD2eu1oq0Y Ys=; b=EzBj7rtWmwyMA8fE/qAXk5sP1FP9jHV6HqyKM70slvbeCzy4dnYQz7NMW I6opR9Sh4aTrdkSY8AzznDE/Pyd8nDsBhn4u1R+aWtRaDehjRkj6iyWzTMTf2wn9 EWGzmDQU9Wa6r34hWmrTMprBHefqq287d1dRxISfRXku5cqePI86LcyQGrNMh/ve W9DWDFdEFw62sKNr62EE+n8ubF1KD5OavW8FPn4mza4jlj2HUZVw1OpI9mT8J1I3 mxAgNRje3yHTjNlND/Oh35DQoxoyG2Ip3gUXk/ncDggEw1gQfVpU8Nk0v/wqUBWN 07TxP/ZzZ+Edh4xP4P3KvItsr96Gw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 75172102E0; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 05:27:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Qian Xu , dpdk-dev , dpdk-test-report Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:27:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1925609.vO2Ab2XL5m@xps> In-Reply-To: <41b40e2e-3b15-f7b3-78df-660610fe0486@intel.com> References: <41b40e2e-3b15-f7b3-78df-660610fe0486@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] is per patch checkpatch reports working? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:27:24 -0000 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit: > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me. Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working. I have just restarted it. For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with the new check in checkpatches.sh.