From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B6DA0C4B; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:26:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A654113E; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:26:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from wnew1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wnew1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BB040140; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:26:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AA82B01191; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 02:26:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 19 Nov 2021 02:26:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= fIxDhniwnHU0yv+NtwIF+JPTMRxerEE3lOet+N3VFwk=; b=JpLUkis2uQeGpkk6 kCwpdBIqkYtjX0Hla7vnTjVtaEc64Y5vUiMFdr9dfd9+mw7Y4ANkM4qoIwSCrnkk LP55421isnvyTTemIdnDvm0EBCWdxrvnYQIjerxe/kE5gwg4n77yRWsogdloQLMe tC91/JmH8L5j61czQYmsbW5VNs7fNtwDYIJ3TDN1EGDV+4TU+Rmxhc6U907bwO19 0Z1Mir8VNFlscq2Nz6jc3kIHilCVlasZZLjWmdZEYtlQ9K+OK84LW8aW2Ny+kAOZ KU3BmbZa20iYtmKkE1zQ5IN9oOV7HY3LhUwn9tk+BbRCfmeLnNLDsqIx0T64KR79 XmxaVQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=fIxDhniwnHU0yv+NtwIF+JPTMRxerEE3lOet+N3VF wk=; b=jWyksQXEWlbESaTOPGUpVYK8VjlAEbiWAx9x1lh0sxtaYrz1dOpJapijo 6t+/FVCToHM3Me+/RPeCzFOslB/sxIxPWnCVT9eDsURmMJ74503B2saOI6zFhVwm dgzQ9OMtE0RIEP+KDMHuLTD+qWnmZSdjUTofvDHiSNSTiC0AYjhdGQGSngTo3JFs d9kvIIgk9lAQnZaB0oTLIBJ502BTFH2smwJZFRh7vzgaGObmROXDRYKRVBOH9hkZ clTCPrcOIaJytZ3npwpREYaRFBxcKp6C3Cc/NMjJtElb5i7cuj+w9fAXiCXIHM2c FWHSaNSAYAQbc8TrcU4+emlQqWqzA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrfeejgddutdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 02:26:18 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , David Marchand , Lincoln Lavoie , "Ajmera, Megha" , "Singh, Jasvinder" , "Liguzinski, WojciechX" Cc: dev , Aaron Conole , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "ci@dpdk.org" , "Zegota, AnnaX" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 826] red_autotest random failures Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:26:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1928246.j4tpOohVRJ@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 18/11/2021 23:10, Liguzinski, WojciechX: > Hi, > > I was trying to reproduce this test failure, but for me RED tests are passing. > I was running the exact test command like the one described in Bug 826 - 'red_autotest' on the current main branch. The test is not always failing. There are some failing conditions, please find them. I think you should try in a container with more limited resources.