From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302411B441
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 10:27:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2CC29557;
 Mon, 14 Jan 2019 04:27:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 04:27:35 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=InghwCLFNN
 0O8Dz1Nzr6UtnDLNzTUPuwMYaZmg4nl58=; b=eI7JL7v6ClViuKmEeahcFMcFnk
 YJF6F44A8mxo5aYXxXMjJ178EAD9GF7GNDN5rwWYH8M4Ycdc6Q+6yTUKfgF6J/BO
 uAXWjoMH303zeVTonKaA9q2OYEPSGOfGny2/6pz9pIoFAzQ8WeKb7sVTq+T9BWTP
 7aZugeZyah6TaK8T4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy
 :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=InghwC
 LFNN0O8Dz1Nzr6UtnDLNzTUPuwMYaZmg4nl58=; b=J+KLTtFyvtgkITvB0ZrRu6
 /BTEiZuXvYZfpxBYDHBBP3SYDVEmEgVZjohn5H+C0/ml6sNCeCpTf3Pxp7NNknLn
 k+O5bOudNCsl0K+UGftzkFPiShHwnzufi0ewpbyB2H32+taxE3CGH9NzXFHdNjEC
 u6amZdQews/meSNLHWoaQ7Fmm28r2uztqEB2xeo3FjNIJSkBlLckyeG+1TtX8tVA
 jsY0S2qhEBD/bM2XV61lTLEvj+oOQI/nYVn2n7UdyPrTC3QT9ArTMvSk5t+/R8zU
 0syJ7pXZb35Jo4YJKjvxRT24K3eYJGOFobzmdXJBEAkr5T0WvzMEHNtQU0d0gnbA
 ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:BlY8XCnG_BnFKP8HtrPC6ast92e8lRLxXuyYLCY7nZmC0YEfjUs_TQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrgedugddtgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
 curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedt
 tdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvufffkfgggf
 gtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhh
 ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrud
 ekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdr
 nhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:BlY8XFHahp54CmMc8R_jIl_pdmdv103ph_oHyPF5Jkp6gBWH1SSllw>
 <xmx:BlY8XA7emHnb1uj16c90uo1vukD5Yj5M4UE0TtsfnM-Oos895Nse7g>
 <xmx:BlY8XEPc7StyAyTKj43rBm_KG-ZjMvm6baArFstHhaJSp_DUbHou3A>
 <xmx:B1Y8XFXAC5KNmDJZMzOfxf-ofwVPQJMIvRzzaok-M2SWOQ7HJW6l5g>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4A4591027C;
 Mon, 14 Jan 2019 04:27:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com, Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 10:27:31 +0100
Message-ID: <1952826.YqNEUC1v6x@xps>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: [dpdk-dev] mbuf file in BPF test
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:27:36 -0000

Hi Konstantin,

There is an outdated copy of rte_mbuf.h in test/bpf/mbuf.h.
It is bringing confusion when grepping code.
Would it be possible to remove this file?