From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4952A0C43; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:53:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD7F42749; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:53:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4951442738 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:53:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04C55C0115; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 08:53:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 26 Nov 2021 08:53:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= hdERsoJleZ5lqA0+4KQyDgzntn2wc0z4tgNBUpG97Xw=; b=i/bCtsA4V38nsusf f5nsRLw9eubZMcpgF/fXofs1AT8ArQjn4YTUBR6PMNT9O0CxFktotjybp2iqrVo4 KHx6R3vzjW/LA9+eEGydHFNk9GAG5H8jtdYAwX8r3NjBKtiqCs8nQ50knZnROEWp XtusyFmVxdT55RJgqXZpt753A4abn3MaDYOWQsB5/VvR7g7/B+C51cnSbXegRV3N Fb4hX0bFi3cVmMrz4oHlA6sgbrHyxmc3H1V5kF/T7bzKqPF2RE0cCTrNqgOP2+hP ODAOm3MGF2Iu0C6xPNEanvYYMaZ2l51nr+eQkd8+wGxGuTKuQ9HQnODW62Oah7Yl yh8E8w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=hdERsoJleZ5lqA0+4KQyDgzntn2wc0z4tgNBUpG97 Xw=; b=SFaHNZGIMjAOYWkefw+ariJ4ZcKp9lU32dSPw11Ka8S523wQE6OidCE1X zp12EpveABmgDBl2YIsONoyKjNp8KhFEUGMfn0wfnjhnko/Opw97u9C9XpbERGcp U+IkQkHvYJ9aTgCQja3MwWpIbTgu+H/qcZTE70l6NGrfB03dnmfk6Fn7lxJPilGC UlW3ooke3z1ipV6V6SuuqLBIhlqhZP5G50aE3GIrPzbjq1UGqdDiqmTYBlc7W5tw j0SdqQz8XiZPynHkU7SA/H/iJU6G59smfEGWEJX80P/bEYtth2PfH4s9QyXDRgeq JneMuQxN6Oa6i+mW5FrBYbNzajkAg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrhedvgdehiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeekteehtdeivefhieegjeelgedufeejheekkeetueevieeuvdevuedt jeevheevteenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 08:53:56 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Juraj =?utf-8?B?TGlua2XFoQ==?= Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] doc: arm64 cross docs improvements/fixes Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:53:55 +0100 Message-ID: <1965953.Lthp3rX6bU@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1637229656-21612-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> References: <1637229656-21612-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 18/11/2021 11:00, Juraj Linke=C5=A1: > Numactl cross compilation doesn't work with clang, remove it and fix the > gcc cross compiler executable name. >=20 > Remove CFLAGS and LDFLAGS since Meson doesn't support them well enough. > Add alternatives. >=20 > The names of the downloaded gcc binaries differ from those in cross > files, so point this out in docs. >=20 > Fixes: eb0e12c0c299 ("doc: add clang to aarch64 cross build guide") >=20 > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > --- > Let me know if I should split the patch. Yes, there are many things to discuss and review. Please split each concern in its own patch. Anyway I cannot merge such patch without an Arm maintainer review.