From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31ECAA0487 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:02:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A311BDE6; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:02:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6AC1B9D5 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:02:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A326222006; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 05:02:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Jul 2019 05:02:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=S4JOYyzWnwTwr00e4k1qE3CEftJyrbhClGFA5Ld2yRA=; b=VVLdF//W9PtC czdBXJOKKLj6SEeP17jROwpoH69Yzko/Vx5vX1Hl626Xi2FAqEY/Ej1HDKyN25Q5 0RvBvet9/rKr9RCPxOQeNbQqV/P6EVLGPm1p0H7DgC/yK6tAbUV090G7N3negpNa 6yIG+MO31vktWp58TJd0h1S9l8VW6Zk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=S4JOYyzWnwTwr00e4k1qE3CEftJyrbhClGFA5Ld2y RA=; b=VNcwT4u1TMzowLGdjXNvHrN0j4Q2duaq/Rsv8uPCPAQWeyHjf9oooXiFC q5BvB7CLPJCZih2V1ThE74DfDr5O470gVYddGEDakHVMEgE4BwMUet4/FElhVqdL xjRFTV09eznNEoi1WJp/SDYZ8GXG5gvQBRducj/+LcRBZX28GN1xOrHjew4uyGGb y5B9sGaJIEvthf9QEKei4dYN7QPPHtp/Gt7NklVDzcEu0zX9VcqW35aq1POHU6lg CM0o5wntxTAzt/akboDc5t++ff7uj5jMu1BZM9yfK2V8OPhJFLC/b0IEuis6B8f6 MPjRMu2FDoPVbDLtTxK1lKXNqTmzA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrfeeggdduudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehm ohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehhuhgrrhhmrdgtohhmnecukfhppe ejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhm rghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6DC418005C; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 05:02:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: pbhagavatula@marvell.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, gavin.hu@arm.com, jerinj@marvell.com Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 11:02:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1966653.7aN1hUl6W2@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190705042650.3457-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> References: <20190705042650.3457-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mempool/octeontx2: fix arm64 clang build failure X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 05/07/2019 06:26, pbhagavatula@marvell.com: > From: Pavan Nikhilesh > > The ARMv8.1 CASP instruction works with even register pairs and since > there no register constraint in older versions of GCC/Clang, use > explicit register allocation to satisfy CASP requirements. > Remove function level optimization specification as Clang doesnt have > support for it and explicit register allocation removes the need for it. > > Fixes build issue with arm64-armv8a-linux-clang. > > Fixes: ee338015e7a9 ("mempool/octeontx2: add optimized dequeue operation for arm64") > > Reported-by: Gavin Hu > Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh > Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Applied, thanks