From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com
 [74.125.82.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EAB5696
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:15:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wesw55 with SMTP id w55so9583975wes.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 03:15:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=c3JgIcUYo2+WC4uBwmHAtNo/gmthH/CsMVPiqLlyeJU=;
 b=O4k3jzIwo63VqHE7SeXM34HwTqafD8eLjNVfSB+qF1ip8TsbLTy3ZyGB3ZwLGepN1N
 aCL4RKav2Nr7QH/8eLZ40fDlnk5IHqgrcBX2sxpyIvaJBLtu5lWQh20Dd1+cG1g7xsiq
 FpYNofde8MmuCUOIWEDtZK43sT6awWZy9mLrSSd2nuNNBs2ZM5TDt/wrut4gDzovH/Oy
 6ComxkaAVDTWXEZ6MtetFvm1M9chdDi5mrmAmkOV57QgMlhfag7Ntyblg6DpPkP6DGsH
 F63jv7J5QLtK1ud0yataQxIF46T102qd9hK9n5W6Ktq1Dykdyoz3JdZP0doJ9FEQQmdv
 3F0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmu4QRZfHB93Z2QOZ+f8dXWBDmNVN8/oFfHQDnMAUtobU0/mkBPfBAZ/pJDGDFWR6dHYd7Z
X-Received: by 10.180.189.203 with SMTP id gk11mr15368730wic.32.1424949316237; 
 Thu, 26 Feb 2015 03:15:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dn7sm18024533wid.12.2015.02.26.03.15.13
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 26 Feb 2015 03:15:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:14:39 +0100
Message-ID: <1976981.gNbPL03jx1@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.4 (Linux/3.18.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.4; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20150225142851.55406347@miho>
References: <20150225142851.55406347@miho>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak
	C++11 code
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:15:16 -0000

Hi Simon,

2015-02-25 14:28, Simon Kagstrom:
> When compiling C++11-code or above (--std=c++11), the build fails with
> lots of
> 
>   rte_eth_ctrl.h:517:3: note: in expansion of macro RTE_ALIGN
>     (RTE_ALIGN(RTE_ETH_FLOW_MAX, UINT32_BIT)/UINT32_BIT)
>     ^
> 
> When reading the GCC info pages, I get the feeling that __typeof__ is
> a better choice, and that indeed works when including the headers in
> C++ files (--std=c++11).

I'd like to be sure that it's working with every compilers we support
(gcc, icc, clang).
Anyone to check please?