DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: fix the combined library problems by replacing it with a linker script
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:07:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1979393.TOkl0U0KRM@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <079fa1cfc3550c8147ea8b137fa1bc0f34d051dc.1448375477.git.pmatilai@redhat.com>

Hi,

I'm reviving this old thread.
My understanding is that everybody prefer the linker script
than the current combined library which had neither symbol versioning
nor library dependency informations.

Comments below:

2015-11-24 16:31, Panu Matilainen:
> The physically linked-together combined library has been an increasing
> source of problems, as was predicted when library and symbol versioning
> was introduced. Replace the complex and fragile construction with a
> simple linker script which achieves the same without all the problems,
> remove the related kludges from eg mlx drivers.
> 
> Since creating the linker script is practically zero cost, remove the
> config option and just create it always.
[...]
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mk/rte.combinedlib.mk
> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> +#   BSD LICENSE
> +#
> +#   Copyright(c) 2010-2015 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> +#   All rights reserved.
> +#
> +#   Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> +#   modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> +#   are met:
> +#
> +#     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> +#       notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> +#     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> +#       notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
> +#       the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> +#       distribution.
> +#     * Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its
> +#       contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
> +#       from this software without specific prior written permission.

Why this header, Panu?
I think you should write your own copyright, and assume the linker script ;)

It needs to be rebased and some docs comments must be removed or updated.
I'll send a v2.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-23 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-24 14:31 Panu Matilainen
2015-11-24 14:55 ` Neil Horman
2015-11-24 21:28   ` Aaron Conole
2015-11-24 22:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-25  8:38   ` Panu Matilainen
2015-11-25 13:00     ` Neil Horman
2015-11-25 16:08     ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-26  8:05       ` Panu Matilainen
2015-11-30 15:03       ` Neil Horman
2015-11-30 16:41         ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-01 12:21           ` Panu Matilainen
2015-12-01 12:36             ` Robie Basak
2015-12-01 13:30               ` Neil Horman
2015-12-08 17:03                 ` Robie Basak
2015-12-09 14:16                   ` Neil Horman
2015-12-01 13:20           ` Neil Horman
2015-12-01 12:37 ` Robie Basak
2015-12-02 11:44   ` Neil Horman
2015-12-03  1:31     ` Ferruh Yigit
2015-12-03  8:11       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2015-12-03 14:59       ` Neil Horman
2015-12-04 17:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-07  8:27   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2015-12-07 10:33     ` Martinx - ジェームズ
2016-02-23 20:07 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-02-24  9:37   ` Panu Matilainen
2016-02-23 22:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: replace the combined library " Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-01 13:40   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-01 14:48     ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-02 12:30       ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-02 12:40         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02 12:44           ` Panu Matilainen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1979393.TOkl0U0KRM@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).