From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163F31F5 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:22:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b13so21474802wgh.13 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:22:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=MBv5IH3cpay8hUbGUHYTtt8eWT4//DO8DxVEVc7Iuq0=; b=kiN9V4EyA2LLsQAJuuyfRRgNJxc63a0lxMTm8YgSsWitM2gC6WloZVErHD1OujOf9V MwBKI+Jo9LWL/QEYUvyVkLpDcn7g4C9VIRPckqyNDsU+/nIyA8nItizsH75ihdbo1Qeu oq2/XdOHQ3Iilbxc8wAURRuRLxqJ+tAplKI8jH6hu/XED7jUyCs1036Dpz6ZBCWLoMUU /UC2HkJRj/lYHhQXV/ZWqSFDBQfnIG1f3EzCcB8rdA9q2HhEsZQem6BDdSEVyguE5Olj j5ECpGa79mcpnYwQMf9ri1uFLYf4ALPURVv8oNbDwpUcEK3OIiHicFunB0v3Z2fPcyrb WPsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkK7qJkKhsxOqBxq/c2j33Z3o8MDgZcpr6OYe8MWnJ3E4Ws6jVNnR/iunbrlfFsC+CNVaf6 X-Received: by 10.194.179.194 with SMTP id di2mr9433633wjc.4.1422462164768; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:22:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b10sm6739734wjr.32.2015.01.28.08.22.43 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:22:44 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jay Rolette Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:22:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1984288.tOpWI7NYp5@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (Linux/3.18.2-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Process question: reviewing older patches X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:22:45 -0000 2015-01-28 09:52, Jay Rolette: > There's a fairly old KNI patch (http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/84/) > that I reviewed, but I'm not seeing how to submit my "Reviewed-by" when I > don't have any of the emails from the patch in my mail client. > > I can copy the text from the 'mbox' link in Patchwork into an email, but > I'm guessing that may not make the patch toolchain happy. > > What's the right way to do this? I think you should try to open the mbox file with your mail client and reply. In my case, I had to rename it into .mbox (was .patch). Thanks for reviewing -- Thomas