From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163F31F5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:22:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b13so21474802wgh.13
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:22:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=MBv5IH3cpay8hUbGUHYTtt8eWT4//DO8DxVEVc7Iuq0=;
 b=kiN9V4EyA2LLsQAJuuyfRRgNJxc63a0lxMTm8YgSsWitM2gC6WloZVErHD1OujOf9V
 MwBKI+Jo9LWL/QEYUvyVkLpDcn7g4C9VIRPckqyNDsU+/nIyA8nItizsH75ihdbo1Qeu
 oq2/XdOHQ3Iilbxc8wAURRuRLxqJ+tAplKI8jH6hu/XED7jUyCs1036Dpz6ZBCWLoMUU
 /UC2HkJRj/lYHhQXV/ZWqSFDBQfnIG1f3EzCcB8rdA9q2HhEsZQem6BDdSEVyguE5Olj
 j5ECpGa79mcpnYwQMf9ri1uFLYf4ALPURVv8oNbDwpUcEK3OIiHicFunB0v3Z2fPcyrb
 WPsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkK7qJkKhsxOqBxq/c2j33Z3o8MDgZcpr6OYe8MWnJ3E4Ws6jVNnR/iunbrlfFsC+CNVaf6
X-Received: by 10.194.179.194 with SMTP id di2mr9433633wjc.4.1422462164768;
 Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:22:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b10sm6739734wjr.32.2015.01.28.08.22.43
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:22:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Jay Rolette <rolette@infiniteio.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:22:17 +0100
Message-ID: <1984288.tOpWI7NYp5@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (Linux/3.18.2-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CADNuJVquvtvGhZRsg6AX=Jgpni=HWUQS8U262sBNgKp0aDd_8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADNuJVquvtvGhZRsg6AX=Jgpni=HWUQS8U262sBNgKp0aDd_8A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Process question: reviewing older patches
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:22:45 -0000

2015-01-28 09:52, Jay Rolette:
> There's a fairly old KNI patch (http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/84/)
> that I reviewed, but I'm not seeing how to submit my "Reviewed-by" when I
> don't have any of the emails from the patch in my mail client.
> 
> I can copy the text from the 'mbox' link in Patchwork into an email, but
> I'm guessing that may not make the patch toolchain happy.
> 
> What's the right way to do this?

I think you should try to open the mbox file with your mail client and reply.
In my case, I had to rename it into .mbox (was .patch).

Thanks for reviewing
-- 
Thomas