From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF72C4285A; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:29:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4440A40EDF; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:29:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A11A4021D; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:29:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AC55C005F; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:29:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:29:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1680020973; x=1680107373; bh=jRJaiLZDC+RscVyCuGLHtjCdAaFcogi9eHm HQH6BZ+A=; b=BOroXM7DCXMH4XmpUF9ZyJ5r0QrX0ofnNzcGkMtYNADDctb/OBY ETXQdWXbxKcQiH1njjN7vrVdCVmjpHEEQj/TU7/ofWwEYxdFyhxLtsAjCVbrdxNA kTRnxCO4QNnpVr2q7Vkn1fwYnner8K03JsnS5dfygyY1tTFZubYGdPg7tonGtZuw 2/0LaGYZV0FAnfhX7R1+BgiCQldPeF8tJn8FGyW7usuG0hEHmZwaoaw7n7Y0W5H+ 7O7g8Q4/BT0NnjCA5RNIp6uuSO0Hivd6LlbkMln2uUPk1RrFap6PZMbWo0YSn+9Y utCzEueY/UOVn2twUEdU9J0aw5Uie1flAUA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1680020973; x=1680107373; bh=jRJaiLZDC+RscVyCuGLHtjCdAaFcogi9eHm HQH6BZ+A=; b=pDqFano1BwhlUWwgMgaHDv+yfkw+uCjELwElc9gK5AuWf2+2S5V O06B/zQOGsoT0Dti3PwwUnsenhpyXN/VE99nx3yfUjkTFMB8cshrOqWEsbUVd1rH lwOE5eKycBn6HtTMbA2qa5dTD2OZVQS0I/JghWwCx2Bb1yJDixKRydvE7z0pDvJ/ B1+sIrQBsE96Kz0xQ/MLbGx0OIY+3QxaH/k7QE/rWdkAyTPuNOWDgF4SrBBVLavM p5KVnuIxnHLTJsv8Kihw0dfeb0CuiPFQJJ4OGeOMp07WeSjyr20Xx4Vse3Wxiuaw 8ugJ8/I6Cv/7ffw0whP0Ayls+2RMvR27x0g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdehgedguddtudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejieeifeehtdffgfdvleetueeffeehueejgfeuteeftddt ieekgfekudehtdfgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:29:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Christensen Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, Thinh Tran Subject: Re: [PATCH] acl: fix autotest failures on ppc64le with gcc 11 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:29:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1985067.kXSN5OTJKJ@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20230322172933.461482-1-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20230322172933.461482-1-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 22/03/2023 18:29, David Christensen: > Original acl implementation of Altivec optimized code included an > explicit -O2 optimization level for a particular inlined function. > When DPDK is built with the default -O3 optimization level on gcc > 11.x or later, the resulting code may generate a segmentation > fault as observed in acl_autotest. > > Since there is no explicit reason given for the local function > optimization level in the original commit, and testing with gcc > versions 8.x through 12.x results in working code at all -O > optimization settings, the local optimization is removed. > > Bugzilla ID: 1197 > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: David Christensen > Tested-by: Thinh Tran Applied, thanks.