From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9606BA04B5; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:14:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B712140D12; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:14:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3904140D0A for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:14:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B5C5C01A3; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:14:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:14:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= CFOm6yW87hjfRiz0dQ26XPrsOzcSbioihVy/Bm8ga7s=; b=qGCyzNU6/PdrjFX8 ng7HoPYKRNjH3+Q2o5oJQ6IsonHVzn2+gwfpMHtmII099Bh39iK5BpDMqUKdg/lE GyZQIP4+6qoh8AK3Pwn+HfwWVBia1+c/focnzzJbwpS4rTuZCP8JgvfY9SW03wOj QrNnFKIqdHMskhNkyTgSfIh9COuPMGjJpaIRdLTwExy8Y1YGgvwtJNjEJ8qObLDe fAPHfD23qd3+Aa6E7pzyxCw6m4fO2gCOBRY8Mcl+FTpj9co0MMvO7WKuaVobZFIh TaZT7g8v5sDpboOcAaXmVXqObM0X5zkvME9SoeP9bITlpHy/SuPdA2fWTtXF0wxy VG15nw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=CFOm6yW87hjfRiz0dQ26XPrsOzcSbioihVy/Bm8ga 7s=; b=mu+JkL+5YpLL19elQTRJu8Z78UeNvj/AFAmJtmdtn3adiiNghU+ze4ba6 ZIiuL+7o1Rv2budfnIyKGzmqueVKoIUpJF/3Lpu1F9U6SL8b+NVlG7p57Ao6cmP2 MClsYPAz51yXTWbgV3gyvbSmrruQ/GaGpURdtRqbCxf3UfsW+R/hsnup6i1yxgex lsoxuhuIfurJgLKLY0Lf4UNpfodsi8v5FkJbB722sLnJhgyJ9sdJV99iKAtk8X5Q SL9a0y+94rDjMHGTzRHXdwAH4WCU7osCoZPl6uyS7//ZcSxjW+VQU/qSyAWX07R2 ChI9afomUllYTFBMI3WnfHd5eqaug== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdehvddgtdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5D7651080059; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:14:16 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Tal Shnaiderman Cc: dev@dpdk.org, matan@nvidia.com, rasland@nvidia.com, ophirmu@nvidia.com Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:14:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1986718.APOp378I6X@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210107130827.9252-1-talshn@nvidia.com> References: <20201227202114.8716-1-talshn@nvidia.com> <20210107130827.9252-1-talshn@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mlx5: split multi-threaded flows per OS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 07/01/2021 14:08, Tal Shnaiderman: > multi-threaded flows feature uses pthread function pthread_key_create > but for Windows the destruction option in the function is unimplemented. > > to resolve it Windows will implement destruction mechanism to cleanup > mlx5_flow_workspace object for each terminated thread. > > Linux flow will keep the current behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Tal Shnaiderman > Acked-by: Matan Azrad Acked-by: Khoa To Applied in next-net-mlx, thanks.