DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>, thomas@monjalon.net, qi.z.zhang@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:50:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <199f655c-1327-326b-c1b1-5e4fbefc6ae2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524753466-17021-1-git-send-email-wei.dai@intel.com>

On 4/26/2018 3:37 PM, Wei Dai wrote:
> This patch check if a requested offloading is supported
> in the device capability.
> Any offloading is disabled by default if it is not set
> in rte_eth_dev_configure( ) and rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup().
> A per port offloading can only be enabled in
> rte_eth_dev_configure(). If a per port offloading is
> sent to rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ), return error.
> Only per queue offloading can be sent to
> rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ). A per queue offloading is
> enabled only if it is enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure( ) OR
> if it is enabled in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
> If a per queue offloading is enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure(),
> it can't be disabled in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
> If a per queue offloading is disabled in rte_eth_dev_configure( ),
> it can be enabled or disabled( ) in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
> 
> This patch can make such checking in a common way in rte_ethdev
> layer to avoid same checking in underlying PMD.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> index f0f53d4..5485f47 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -1196,6 +1196,28 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>  							ETHER_MAX_LEN;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Any requested offload must be within its device capability */
> +	if ((local_conf.rxmode.offloads & dev_info.rx_offload_capa) !=
> +	     local_conf.rxmode.offloads) {
> +		RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d requested Rx offloads "
> +				    "0x%" PRIx64 " doesn't match Rx offloads "
> +				    "capability 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
> +				    port_id,
> +				    local_conf.rxmode.offloads,
> +				    dev_info.rx_offload_capa);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	if ((local_conf.txmode.offloads & dev_info.tx_offload_capa) !=
> +	     local_conf.txmode.offloads) {
> +		RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d requested Tx offloads "
> +				    "0x%" PRIx64 " doesn't match Tx offloads "
> +				    "capability 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
> +				    port_id,
> +				    local_conf.txmode.offloads,
> +				    dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Setup new number of RX/TX queues and reconfigure device.
>  	 */
> @@ -1547,6 +1569,23 @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_queue_id,
>  						    &local_conf.offloads);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Only per-queue offload can be enabled from application.
> +	 * If any pure per-port offload is sent to this function, return -EINVAL

This comment doesn't match below check, below doesn't check pure per-port offload

> +	 */
> +	if ((local_conf.offloads & dev_info.rx_queue_offload_capa) !=
> +	     local_conf.offloads) {> +		RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Ethdev port_id=%d rx_queue_id=%d "
> +				    "Requested offload 0x%" PRIx64 "doesn't "
> +				    "match per-queue capability 0x%" PRIx64
> +				    " in rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( )\n",
> +				    port_id,
> +				    rx_queue_id,
> +				    local_conf.offloads,
> +				    dev_info.rx_queue_offload_capa);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

Lets add one more check and consider this for rc1, later we can update checks
for suggested API in rc2.

Check to add (this is for existing API)
If a pure per-port update enabled configure, it should be enabled in
queue_setup() as well.


> +
>  	ret = (*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_setup)(dev, rx_queue_id, nb_rx_desc,
>  					      socket_id, &local_conf, mp);
>  	if (!ret) {
> @@ -1681,6 +1720,23 @@ rte_eth_tx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
>  					  &local_conf.offloads);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Only per-queue offload can be enabled from applcation.
> +	 * If any pure per-port offload is sent to this function, return -EINVAL
> +	 */
> +	if ((local_conf.offloads & dev_info.tx_queue_offload_capa) !=
> +	     local_conf.offloads) {
> +		RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Ethdev port_id=%d tx_queue_id=%d "
> +				    "Requested offload 0x%" PRIx64 "doesn't "
> +				    "match per-queue capability 0x%" PRIx64
> +				    " in rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( )\n",
> +				    port_id,
> +				    tx_queue_id,
> +				    local_conf.offloads,
> +				    dev_info.tx_queue_offload_capa);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	return eth_err(port_id, (*dev->dev_ops->tx_queue_setup)(dev,
>  		       tx_queue_id, nb_tx_desc, socket_id, &local_conf));
>  }
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-26 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-01 13:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: check consistency of per port offloads Wei Dai
2018-03-28  8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-04-13 17:31   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-15 10:37     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-16  3:06       ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-25 11:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:49     ` Wei Dai
2018-04-25 11:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Wei Dai
2018-04-25 17:04     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26  7:59       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26  8:18         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26  8:51           ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-04-26 14:45             ` Dai, Wei
2018-04-26 14:37     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Wei Dai
2018-04-26 15:50       ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2018-04-26 15:56         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-26 15:59           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 16:11         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-03  1:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 11:12         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:02         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Wei Dai
2018-05-04 14:42           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-04 14:45             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-05 18:59           ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-05-07  7:15             ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 10:58             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:05           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] " Wei Dai
2018-05-08 10:41             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:02               ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 11:22                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 11:37             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-08 12:34               ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 12:12             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 12:45               ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10  0:49             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] ethdev: new Rx/Tx offloads API Wei Dai
2018-05-10  0:56               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10  1:28                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10  2:35                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-10 11:27                   ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10  9:25                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-10 19:47                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 11:30                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 11:56                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12] " Wei Dai
2018-05-10 21:39                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14  8:37                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 11:19                         ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-10 21:48                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-14 12:00                     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 12:54                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 13:26                         ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-14 13:20                       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14] " Wei Dai
2018-05-14 14:11                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 14:46                           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-10 21:08                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 10:10           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-05-08 17:51             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-05-09  2:10               ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-09 14:11               ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 22:40                 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=199f655c-1327-326b-c1b1-5e4fbefc6ae2@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=wei.dai@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).