From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9EBA00C4; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:04:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C094242670; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:04:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E312D4069D for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:04:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1656677064; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=c5iJ9rfWjnu+id+7bt/+HGdKRz6SgSmTiXZ+mXPp5Eg=; b=bgZjfU+PO42Wluwgo4ni+4VK0MtamiOOIs5Dkc368Hs1SgAUNwNRWWWomefa/5U0a9+GM4 w9c2xkrCnfuXo+1wYlbUh8KGPTrxhsOMfwZNAPjJn/R48U6e7NdSIczwD8SoJSNp08KTB5 18MZC/5Kp+dSMVLrW3EvyJPfsd2kAlc= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-339-cdxoAeBEP7aUvSwnh4miSw-1; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 08:04:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: cdxoAeBEP7aUvSwnh4miSw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04B322919ED6; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.30] (unknown [10.39.208.30]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CB20C15D5C; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <19b48849-c58b-463c-7fda-9bdf669329cf@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:04:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa/ifc: fix vhost message size check issue To: Andy Pei , dev@dpdk.org Cc: chenbo.xia@intel.com, rosen.xu@intel.com, qimaix.xiao@intel.com References: <1655819191-124476-1-git-send-email-andy.pei@intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: <1655819191-124476-1-git-send-email-andy.pei@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.8 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 6/21/22 15:46, Andy Pei wrote: > For vhost message VHOST_USER_GET_CONFIG, we do not check > payload size in vhost lib, we check payload size in driver > specific ops. > For ifc vdpa driver, we just need to make sure payload size > is not smaller than sizeof(struct virtio_blk_config). > > Fixes: 856d03bcdc54 ("vdpa/ifc: add block operations") > > Signed-off-by: Andy Pei > --- > drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin Thanks, Maxime