DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Weglicki, MichalX" <michalx.weglicki@intel.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK2.1 (rc3 & rc4) major performance drop.
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:40:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1AFA2937E172CD4DB2FD9318443C060ED9BDC6@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)

Hello,

Currently I'm integrating OVS head with DPDK 2.1. Based on my tests performance in all scenarios (confirmed on Phy2Phy and Vhostuser) has dropped about 10%. Please find example results below:

PHY2PHY (Bidirectional)
DPDK 2.1:
Iteration 1: 14,164,987 pps
Iteration 2: 13,866,386 pps
Iteration 3: 14,093,153 pps
DPDK 2.0:
Iteration 1: 15,406,646 pps
Iteration 2: 15,410,182 pps
Iteration 3: 15,404,678 pps

VHOSTUser:
DPDK 2.1:
Iteration 1: 3,328,678 pps
Iteration 2: 3,367,130 pps
Iteration 3: 3,259,899 pps
DPDK 2.0:
Iteration 1: 3,786,969 pps
Iteration 2: 3,736,117 pps
Iteration 3: 3,557,150 pps

Based on my test last commit where performance was the same was: 37f9a7270e800df5c603b2c76c73ed3bca3328d9
Bad commit: 1d493a49490fa90e09689d49280cff0d51d0193e

You can find diff in attachment.

Change is still compatible in OVS because in rte_pktmbuf_pool_init, NULL is passed as second argument.

Did anyone noticed such performance drop? Could anyone give me some information why this implementation has changed? Any hints how to get back to previous performance would be very appreciated.

Br,
Michal.


--------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Shannon Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263
Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

             reply	other threads:[~2015-08-11 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-11 10:40 Weglicki, MichalX [this message]
2015-08-11 13:10 ` Mcnamara, John
2015-08-13  1:51   ` Flavio Leitner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1AFA2937E172CD4DB2FD9318443C060ED9BDC6@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=michalx.weglicki@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).