From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C787E79 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:15:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2014 22:20:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,737,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="590680857" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2014 22:23:51 -0700 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.69) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:23:51 -0700 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.203]) by SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.204]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:23:44 +0800 From: "Liu, Jijiang" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/8]app/test-pmd:test VxLAN packet identification Thread-Index: AQHP6Xw1uCNN0eQoQUSimM4VnZS7dpwzwYUw Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 05:23:43 +0000 Message-ID: <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D77681@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1413006935-22535-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> <1413006935-22535-4-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> <2959182.8PakPvQ7cT@xps13> In-Reply-To: <2959182.8PakPvQ7cT@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/8]app/test-pmd:test VxLAN packet identification X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 05:15:56 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 4:02 AM > To: Liu, Jijiang > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/8]app/test-pmd:test VxLAN packet > identification >=20 > 2014-10-11 13:55, Jijiang Liu: > > - "tx_checksum set mask (port_id)\n" > > + "tx_checksum set (mask) (port_id)\n" > > " Enable hardware insertion of checksum offload > with" > > - " the 4-bit mask, 0~0xf, in packets sent on a port.\n" > > + " the 8-bit mask, 0~0xff, in packets sent on a port.\n" > > " bit 0 - insert ip checksum offload if set\n" > > " bit 1 - insert udp checksum offload if set\n" > > " bit 2 - insert tcp checksum offload if set\n" > > " bit 3 - insert sctp checksum offload if set\n" > > + " bit 4 - insert inner ip checksum offload if > set\n" > > + " bit 5 - insert inner udp checksum offload if > set\n" > > + " bit 6 - insert inner tcp checksum offload if > set\n" > > + " bit 7 - insert inner sctp checksum offload if > set\n" > > " Please check the NIC datasheet for HW > limits.\n\n" > [...] > > .help_str =3D "enable hardware insertion of L3/L4checksum with a > given " > > - "mask in packets sent on a port, the bit mapping is given as, Bit 0 f= or > ip" > > - "Bit 1 for UDP, Bit 2 for TCP, Bit 3 for SCTP", > > + "mask in packets sent on a port, the bit mapping is given as, Bit 0 f= or > ip " > > + "Bit 1 for UDP, Bit 2 for TCP, Bit 3 for SCTP, Bit 4 for inner ip " > > + "Bit 5 for inner UDP, Bit 6 for inner TCP, Bit 7 for inner SCTP", > > .tokens =3D { > > (void *)&cmd_tx_cksum_set_tx_cksum, > > (void *)&cmd_tx_cksum_set_set, >=20 > How is it related to VXLAN? > I may have missed something. But if not, I note the name of the reviewers= ;) Yes, it is related to VxLAN Tx Checksum test, I will put the changes to tes= t VxLAN Tx checksum patch. > -- > Thomas