From: "Liu, Jijiang" <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:50:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D9EDBC@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417076319-629-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Could you review this patch today ?
If possible, I hope this patch set can be included RC2.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jijiang Liu
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 4:19 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework
>
> We have got some feedback about backward compatibility of VXLAN TX checksum
> offload API with 1G/10G NIC after the i40e VXLAN TX checksum codes were
> applied, so we have to rework the APIs on i40e, including the changes of mbuf,
> i40e PMD and csum engine.
>
> The main changes in mbuf are as follows, In place of removing
> PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM, we introducing 2 new flags: PKT_TX_OUT_IP_CKSUM,
> PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT, and a new field: l4_tun_len.
> Replace the inner_l2_len and the inner_l3_len field with the outer_l2_len and
> outer_l3_len field.
>
> The existing flags are listed below,
> PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM: HW IPv4 checksum for non-tunnelling packet/ HW inner
> IPv4 checksum for tunnelling packet
> PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM: HW TCP checksum for non-tunnelling packet/ HW inner
> TCP checksum for tunnelling packet
> PKT_TX_SCTP_CKSUM: HW SCTP checksum for non-tunnelling packet/ HW inner
> SCTP checksum for tunnelling packet
> PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM: HW SCTP checksum for non-tunnelling packet/ HW inner
> SCTP checksum for tunnelling packet
> PKT_TX_IPV4: IPv4 with no HW checksum offload for non-tunnelling
> packet/inner IPv4 with no HW checksum offload for tunnelling packet
> PKT_TX_IPV6: IPv6 non-tunnelling packet/ inner IPv6 with no HW checksum
> offload for tunnelling packet
>
> let's use a few examples to demonstrate how to use these flags:
> Let say we have a tunnel packet:
> eth_hdr_out/ipv4_hdr_out/udp_hdr_out/vxlan_hdr/ehtr_hdr_in/ipv4_hdr_in/tcp
> _hdr_in.There could be several scenarios:
>
> A) User requests HW offload for ipv4_hdr_out checksum.
> He doesn't care is it a tunnelled packet or not.
> So he sets:
>
> mb->l2_len = eth_hdr_out;
> mb->l3_len = ipv4_hdr_out;
> mb->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IPV4_CSUM;
>
> B) User is aware that it is a tunnelled packet and requests HW offload for
> ipv4_hdr_in and tcp_hdr_in *only*.
> He doesn't care about outer IP checksum offload.
> In that case, for FVL he has 2 choices:
> 1. Treat that packet as a 'proper' tunnelled packet, and fill all the fields:
> mb->l2_len = eth_hdr_in;
> mb->l3_len = ipv4_hdr_in;
> mb->outer_l2_len = eth_hdr_out;
> mb->outer_l3_len = ipv4_hdr_out;
> mb->l4tun_len = vxlan_hdr;
> mb->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT | PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM |
> PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM;
>
> 2. As user doesn't care about outer IP hdr checksum, he can treat everything
> before ipv4_hdr_in as L2 header.
> So he knows, that it is a tunnelled packet, but makes HW to treat it as ordinary
> (non-tunnelled) packet:
> mb->l2_len = eth_hdr_out + ipv4_hdr_out + udp_hdr_out + vxlan_hdr +
> ehtr_hdr_in;
> mb->l3_len = ipv4_hdr_in;
> mb->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM;
>
> i40e PMD will support both B.1 and B.2.
> ixgbe/igb/em PMD supports only B.2.
> if HW supports both - it will be up to user app which method to choose.
> tespmd will support both methods, and it should be configurable by user which
> approach to use (cmdline parameter).
> So the user can try/test both methods and select an appropriate for him.
>
> Now, B.2 is exactly what Oliver suggested.
> I think it has few important advantages over B.1:
> First of all - compatibility. It works across all HW we currently support
> (i40e/ixgbe/igb/em).
> Second - it is probably faster even on FVL, as for it we have to fill only TXD, while
> with approach #2 we have to fill both TCD and TXD.
>
> C) User knows that is a tunnelled packet, and wants HW offload for all 3
> checksums: outer IP hdr checksum, inner IP checksum, inner TCP checksum.
> Then he has to setup all TX checksum fields:
> mb->l2_len = eth_hdr_in;
> mb->l3_len = ipv4_hdr_in;
> mb->outer_l2_len = eth_hdr_out;
> mb->outer_l3_len = ipv4_hdr_out;
> mb->l4tun_len = vxlan_hdr;
> mb->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_OUT_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL |
> PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM;
>
> Jijiang Liu (3):
> mbuf change
> i40e PMD change in i40e_rxtx.c
> rework csum forward engine
>
> app/test-pmd/csumonly.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 2 +-
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 23 ++++++++++------
> lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 40 ++++++++++++---------------
> 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-27 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-27 8:18 Jijiang Liu
2014-11-27 8:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] mbuf:add two TX offload flags and change three fields Jijiang Liu
2014-11-27 10:00 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-27 13:14 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-28 9:17 ` Olivier MATZ
[not found] ` <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D9EEA0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2014-11-27 14:56 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-27 17:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-28 10:45 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-28 11:16 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-30 14:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-01 2:30 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-12-01 9:52 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-01 11:58 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-01 12:28 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-01 13:07 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-12-01 14:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-27 8:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] i40e:PMD change for VXLAN TX checksum Jijiang Liu
2014-11-27 8:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] testpmd:rework csum forward engine Jijiang Liu
2014-11-27 10:23 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-27 8:50 ` Liu, Jijiang [this message]
2014-11-27 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework Olivier MATZ
2014-11-27 10:12 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-27 12:06 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-27 12:07 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-27 15:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-27 16:31 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-12-03 8:02 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-28 9:26 ` Olivier MATZ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D9EDBC@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=jijiang.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).