From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B39B6AB for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 04:32:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2015 19:32:21 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,599,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="745317119" Received: from kmsmsx151.gar.corp.intel.com ([172.21.73.86]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2015 19:32:19 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by KMSMSX151.gar.corp.intel.com (172.21.73.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:32:18 +0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.246]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.165]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:32:16 +0800 From: "Liu, Jijiang" To: "Moran, John" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] Intel XL710 Thread-Index: AdCjjv5uVQGOhcUeRkKhzbVEYkM4aABKIm5Q Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 02:32:17 +0000 Message-ID: <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC0576C87D@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <6ABAE239154E5C46B731F83C9877C5EAF3EA88CD@wdc1exchmbxp02.hq.corp.viasat.com> In-Reply-To: <6ABAE239154E5C46B731F83C9877C5EAF3EA88CD@wdc1exchmbxp02.hq.corp.viasat.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel XL710 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 02:32:21 -0000 The header split support is being planned in next DPDK release.=20 If you can implement it and submit a patch before next release, it is welco= med. Thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Moran, John > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:07 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Intel XL710 >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I submitted this question yesterday, when I did not belong to group. Re- > submitting now that I am a member! >=20 > I am working on a design where a dpdk/intel710 based switch will receive > VXLAN traffic (DPDK 2.0 with centos 7 and kvm). > Ideally we would like to have the NIC strip the VXLAN header and then > forward the packet based on mac or vlan id of the inner packet. >=20 > Question. From looking the Add a VXLAN sample at > //www.litchfie.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-April/016518.html. it look= s > as if is possible to use the HW header splitter to access inner vlan. The= NIC > will then assign the packet to the correct internal queue? >=20 > I just want to confirm this before I start make promises in design. >=20 > Thanks for any help, >=20 > Jack Moran > ViaSat