From: "Rao, Nikhil" <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
"Singh, Jasvinder" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: support double precision RED queue weight
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 05:43:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1F668163772FA946975B9466A9DFF729ED3AF9EF@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181128221245.017eadcf@xeon-e3>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 11:43 AM
> To: Rao, Nikhil <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
> Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>; Singh, Jasvinder
> <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: support double precision RED queue
> weight
>
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:24:42 +0530
> Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > RED queue weight is currently specified as a negated log of 2.
> >
> > Add support for RED queue weight to be specified in double precision
> > and TM capability flags for double precision and negated log2 RED
> > queue weight support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
>
> Since this is an ABI break anyway, why not just commit to the new format?
Hi Stephen,
Can you please provide more detail on your comment ? are you suggesting replacing the wq_log2/wq_dp with a double ?
Thanks,
Nikhil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-10 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-29 5:54 Nikhil Rao
2018-11-29 6:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-10 5:43 ` Rao, Nikhil [this message]
2018-12-10 16:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-01-10 6:23 ` Rao, Nikhil
2018-12-10 15:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-01-07 16:39 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2019-01-10 16:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Nikhil Rao
2019-03-29 20:16 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2019-03-29 20:16 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1F668163772FA946975B9466A9DFF729ED3AF9EF@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=nikhil.rao@intel.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).