From: "Venkatesan, Venky" <venky.venkatesan@intel.com>
To: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@arccn.ru>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RTE Ring removing
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 14:01:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1FD9B82B8BF2CF418D9A1000154491D9740A339F@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536A1B5C.2010201@6wind.com>
Olivier,
We should look at how to make the memseg capable of doing alloc/free (including re-assembly of fragments) after the 1.7 release. Is that something you are considering doing (or are there any other DPDKers considering this), or should I look at putting together a patch for that?
Regards,
-Venky
-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:39 AM
To: Igor Ryzhov; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RTE Ring removing
Hi Igor,
On 05/07/2014 09:54 AM, Igor Ryzhov wrote:
> I noticed that in Memzone realization there is a special global
> variable "free_memseg" containing pointers on free memory segments.
> An memzone reserve function just finst the best segment for allocation
> from this "free_memseg" variable.
>
> So I think there is a possibility to unreserve already reserved memory
> back to "free_memseg", and impossibility of unreserving memory is just
> because there is no function for that, not because it is impossible in
> principle.
> Am I right? Or there are any restrictions?
I think that implementing a freeing of memory segment is feasible, but it would require some work to properly merge freed zones to avoid memory fragmentation.
Another solution is to allocate/free rings in standard memory (malloc for instance) instead of rte_memzones. Let me know if the patches I've just sent on the mailing list solves your issue.
By the way, I plan to do the same thing for mempools in the coming weeks but there is much more work.
Regards,
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-06 9:05 Igor Ryzhov
2014-05-07 7:54 ` Igor Ryzhov
2014-05-07 11:39 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-07 12:42 ` Igor Ryzhov
2014-05-07 13:08 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-07 14:01 ` Venkatesan, Venky [this message]
2014-05-07 15:09 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-07 15:19 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-07 15:37 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-07 15:36 ` Rogers, Gerald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1FD9B82B8BF2CF418D9A1000154491D9740A339F@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=venky.venkatesan@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=iryzhov@arccn.ru \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).