From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66861A054F; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:55:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D665C40693; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:54:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D444940142 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:54:57 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: mfiyM0YI6CtLLw86txIFMb88D+pBALWsHkhXYqF3O8UyH2CHRJ2CpSyB4zr9sSaYm5Rb59/iZB 05cnlW+D95rQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9890"; a="201170896" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,168,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="201170896" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2021 04:54:56 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 4na9Loq8US5TuUUkKHGh+v0wro5Y1r/Guf+CuaxCvvQfxvWE7OCe/WmyPoTfz5krFEuclIiTqT 0XzKpSydMHdg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,168,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="396697511" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.200.253]) ([10.213.200.253]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2021 04:54:55 -0800 To: Sarosh Arif , dev@dpdk.org References: <20210210115619.8637-1-sarosh.arif@emumba.com> From: Ferruh Yigit X-User: ferruhy Message-ID: <1c18a75e-6a0e-d3ca-aa08-0c4baf875113@intel.com> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:54:52 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210210115619.8637-1-sarosh.arif@emumba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: replace testpmd with .//app/dpdk-testpmd in all commands X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 2/10/2021 11:56 AM, Sarosh Arif wrote: > replace testpmd with .//app/dpdk-testpmd in all commands > because on compilation through meson, dpdk-testpmd is the default > application name. > > Signed-off-by: Sarosh Arif > --- > doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst | 8 ++++---- > doc/guides/nics/e1000em.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/nics/kni.rst | 4 ++-- > doc/guides/nics/mlx4.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/nics/qede.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/nics/virtio.rst | 2 +- > 7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst b/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst > index 801ec3ca5..1e2f78a2e 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst > @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ The application enables multiple TX and RX queues when it is started. > > .. code-block:: console > > -   testpmd -l 1,3,5 --main-lcore 1 --txq=2 –rxq=2 --nb-cores=2 > +   .//app/dpdk-testpmd -l 1,3,5 --main-lcore 1 --txq=2 –rxq=2 --nb-cores=2 > Ok to replace 'testpmd' -> 'dpdk-testpmd', but do we really need to add the relative path? Users can be calling the application from installed folder, and this additional information brings additional maintenance cost with a small to none benefit, what do you think to drop the folder path?