DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: New Reviewer entry type added to MAINTAINERS
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 07:59:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dbf4aaf-7a77-101d-24ea-6e3faec6165f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3460938.iZNE5J4TDP@thomas>

On 10/1/20 2:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 01/10/2020 23:22, Chautru, Nicolas:
>> From: trix@redhat.com <trix@redhat.com>
>>> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
>>> Copied from the Linux kernel MAINTAINERS file.
>>> A Reviewer is designated person who wishes to review changes in areas of
>>> interest.
>>> Added self as Reviewer for baseband.
>>> I am a Linux kernel Reviewer for the fpga n3000/vista creek which has
>>> several bitstream based baseband devices.  So I want to help out here as
>>> well.
>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
>> Thanks for the help. 
>> Note that they are a few other BBDEV patches in flight for 20.11 on top of the acc100 PMD that you may want to be aware of. 
>> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=&submitter=chautru&state=&q=&archive=&delegate=
>> Acked-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> [...]
>>>  Baseband API - EXPERIMENTAL
>>>  M: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
>>> +R: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> I don't understand the need of differenciating maintainer and reviewer.
> If you are trusted enough, why not just being co-maintainer?
I want to help out with the reviews, the reviewer type makes clear this level of commitment.

Maintainer is the next, higher level of commitment.

Trust wise, this would allow the maintainer verify the reviewer does have the bandwidth to be responsive

and effective before committing to sharing responsibility.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-02 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-01 14:30 trix
2020-10-01 21:22 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-01 21:54   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-02 14:59     ` Tom Rix [this message]
2020-10-02 15:41       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-02 16:35         ` Tom Rix

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1dbf4aaf-7a77-101d-24ea-6e3faec6165f@redhat.com \
    --to=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).