From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3C55595 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 17:12:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2016 08:12:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,323,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="759864636" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.189]) ([10.237.220.189]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2016 08:12:14 -0700 To: Keren Hochman , dev@dpdk.org References: From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <1e55de95-d57f-0832-37c9-538cf180422f@intel.com> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:12:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] imissed in rte_pmd_pcap X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 15:12:16 -0000 Hi Keren, On 9/12/2016 7:44 AM, Keren Hochman wrote: > Hello, > in the dpdk pcap driver, the imissed indicator of rte_eth_stats structure > is not increasing even when we miss packets since there are no available > mbufs. I looked at the code and I saw that nothing increase it in the pcap > driver code ( as opposed to other drivers where it's being promoted) As you said, it is not implemented, any patch welcome. > Is there a reason for that? No specific reason as far as I know. > Is there other way to follow missed packets > when using libpcap ? > Thanks, Keren >