From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA82A04B6; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:59:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E408D1D6FE; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:59:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134191D626; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:59:54 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: ff871n3toALdPkemS2j15NH0sHejXmNiBtENVsBLz2t5qScknCx9N9JgxaYi1Sxzn5eLOpFHcR D4Pmg1ESZ4Vg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9751"; a="160666819" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,290,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="160666819" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Sep 2020 05:59:52 -0700 IronPort-SDR: RZN/dkS8NHDExLFiUeV8xD+2t5ZYiSomh4Neau/NhZbH8aTlimJxhgNlUPB2mE96Uem8zaKG9n m128QibiH6xQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,290,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="342009206" Received: from fmsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.83]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2020 05:59:52 -0700 Received: from shsmsx605.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.215) by fmsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 05:59:51 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX605.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:59:49 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:59:49 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Jiang, JunyuX" , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "Guo, Jia" , "Xing, Beilei" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Jiang, JunyuX" , "stable@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters Thread-Index: AQHWkMWWI0jpufVcvEqV9f9aUiSgUKl0ntzA Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:59:49 +0000 Message-ID: <1ea21601b7d9467fb34d1a1b572290f7@intel.com> References: <20200910015426.3140-1-junyux.jiang@intel.com> <20200922091931.3483-1-junyux.jiang@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200922091931.3483-1-junyux.jiang@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: dev On Behalf Of Junyu Jiang > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 5:20 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Guo, Jia ; Xing, Beilei ; Y= igit, > Ferruh ; Jiang, JunyuX ; > stable@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters >=20 > This patch fixed the issue that rx/tx bytes statistics counters overflowe= d on 48 > bit limitation by enlarging the limitation. >=20 > Fixes: 4861cde46116 ("i40e: new poll mode driver") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org >=20 > Signed-off-by: Junyu Jiang > Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks Qi