From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9671B657
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  3 Apr 2018 10:19:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com
 [10.11.54.6])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3204D722E1;
 Tue,  3 Apr 2018 08:19:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.36.112.46] (ovpn-112-46.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.46])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84595215CDAF;
 Tue,  3 Apr 2018 08:19:07 +0000 (UTC)
To: Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: jianfeng.tan@intel.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com, yliu@fridaylinux.org,
 cunming.liang@intel.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, dan.daly@intel.com
References: <1517614137-62926-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
 <20180402114656.17090-1-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
 <20180402114656.17090-3-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1f85f472-3fd3-b988-cc6c-71b1776e4bd0@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:19:05 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180402114656.17090-3-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.6
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.2]); Tue, 03 Apr 2018 08:19:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.2]);
 Tue, 03 Apr 2018 08:19:09 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.6'
 DOMAIN:'int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com'
 HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'maxime.coquelin@redhat.com' RCPT:''
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/5] vhost: support selective datapath
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 08:19:10 -0000



On 04/02/2018 01:46 PM, Zhihong Wang wrote:
> +int
> +rte_vdpa_register_device(struct rte_vdpa_dev_addr *addr,
> +		struct rte_vdpa_dev_ops *ops)
> +{
> +	struct rte_vdpa_device *dev;
> +	char device_name[MAX_VDPA_NAME_LEN];
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (vdpa_device_num >= MAX_VHOST_DEVICE)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_VHOST_DEVICE; i++) {
> +		if (vdpa_devices[i] && is_same_vdpa_device(addr,
> +					&vdpa_devices[i]->addr))
> +			return -1;
> +	}

For consistency, I changed above check to look like same one in 
_find_device_id:

	for (i = 0; i < MAX_VHOST_DEVICE; i++) {
		dev = vdpa_devices[i];
		if (dev && is_same_vdpa_device(&dev->addr, addr))
			return -1;
	}

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_VHOST_DEVICE; i++) {
> +		if (vdpa_devices[i] == NULL)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	sprintf(device_name, "vdpa-dev-%d", i);
> +	dev = rte_zmalloc(device_name, sizeof(struct rte_vdpa_device),
> +			RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> +	if (!dev)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	memcpy(&dev->addr, addr, sizeof(struct rte_vdpa_dev_addr));
> +	dev->ops = ops;
> +	vdpa_devices[i] = dev;
> +	vdpa_device_num++;
> +
> +	return i;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +rte_vdpa_unregister_device(int did)
> +{
> +	if (did < 0 || did >= MAX_VHOST_DEVICE || vdpa_devices[did] == NULL)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	rte_free(vdpa_devices[did]);
> +	vdpa_devices[did] = NULL;
> +	vdpa_device_num--;
> +
> +	return did;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +rte_vdpa_find_device_id(struct rte_vdpa_dev_addr *addr)
> +{
> +	struct rte_vdpa_device *dev;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_VHOST_DEVICE; ++i) {
> +		dev = vdpa_devices[i];
> +		if (dev && is_same_vdpa_device(&dev->addr, addr) == 0)
> +			return i;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -1;
> +}
> +