From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DC72C29
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:05:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32])
 by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2016 05:05:19 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,357,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="20362756"
Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.83])
 ([10.237.220.83])
 by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2016 05:05:18 -0700
To: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
 Olivier Gournet <ogournet@corp.free.fr>
References: <1475072658-29534-1-git-send-email-ogournet@corp.free.fr>
 <20161011094538.GO17252@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Message-ID: <1fbd24e3-7831-2d8e-9726-1c2f0e0a050c@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:05:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161011094538.GO17252@6wind.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix init on secondary process
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:05:20 -0000

Hi Olivier,

On 10/11/2016 10:45 AM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
> 
> Secondary process support's got overlooked during this refactoring, thanks
> for the patch. However can you describe the issue you're addressing as part
> of the commit log?
> 
> I think problems started when txq got mistakenly converted to
> primary_txq_ctrl in 21c8bb4928c9 ("net/mlx5: split Tx queue structure"), you
> may add a Fixes line for that one as well.
> 
> Otherwise, this patch looks fine to me.
> 

Patch doesn't apply cleanly, can you please rebase the patch on top of
latest dpdk-next-net?

Thanks,
ferruh