From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62287A0096 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:44:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2241BAC7; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:44:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.224]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8131B9FD for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:44:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5DD24BD; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 04:44:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Jun 2019 04:44:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=TEKzx3P9jqAIqr50egSdtuEnFyBcf5CE6kTAVf/hr5c=; b=kPBsY29Xhbyr IxKDS1r9vG/5Ny6XsXfS3TmWJShhvyai5526G3p518Ie3al0fBIkfbmzY9rxCBrh Eyz4b83k7+G+CyKJsYfgNQU7Z7ClrwieAWptvRfXgYpBwQdDiwHWKyprPdzBT7wj c0jnxW1LMP5gi52EZwoB9kya/IU79Rc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=TEKzx3P9jqAIqr50egSdtuEnFyBcf5CE6kTAVf/hr 5c=; b=EAZHax39wGpo+ko+UgKaFB6LzkJdnc9uDcYFA/rS72dCFX2TV17z6ouyx 6+ycRPHkJNLksPZsZ8PpCZeixBgcBpIJl9f9aXygG2teFbYqQkQeT2+SD1D22n0g dgMYhfMH70j8+SGocvBLWXGB77BgI9yata6p+pAzFppXwubjYdHnhtcbrGc6pmiX NxufWv8Qa8gGyBZyiWQ5qsZxtfzmNU5IzI+VAj9eekUdzANfiahyDdpN3kk9/sc3 D3aBEYJK5FpkNgYYY2LOSq0UhKmqA3kYT/HFIknOIJWxfliMYwyLDIkaSy0/JfrT BuQMWAG9TyVg6bZSuDVXXySzy3zNA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrudefledgtdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6AF82380084; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 04:44:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Omar Cardona , Harini Ramakrishnan , Jeffrey Tippet Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Adham Masarwah , Bruce Richardson , "Menon, Ranjit" , "Kadam, Pallavi" , Yohad Tor , Rani Sharoni , Tal Shnaiderman Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 10:43:59 +0200 Message-ID: <2002358.ryAd6E37yW@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20190521135236.GA1364@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Generating Debug information in Windows using Clang (PDB files) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 21/05/2019 16:33, Adham Masarwah: > From: Bruce Richardson > > Yes, the clang-cl compiler (like msvc) does not offer the flags we need to control the exact output microarchitecture. It also uses completely different flag formats for things like warnings etc, which is why we need to use clang instead. > > In this case we should find a solution to open the debug ability since we will need it for sure. > What can be done, who can help causing clang generates good files ? Please, some help from Microsoft would be very appreciated. Thanks