From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Ouyang, Changchun" <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] ether: Add API to support setting TX rate for queue and VF
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 01:02:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2006926.ZSHy59qidU@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F52918179C57134FAEC9EA62FA2F9625117C8899@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Changchun,
2014-06-05 03:30, Ouyang, Changchun:
> As we can see below, There are already 4 existing functions for vf in the header file:
> rte_ethdev.h:int rte_eth_dev_set_vf_rxmode(uint8_t port, uint16_t vf, uint16_t rx_mode,
> rte_ethdev.h:rte_eth_dev_set_vf_tx(uint8_t port,uint16_t vf, uint8_t on);
> rte_ethdev.h:rte_eth_dev_set_vf_rx(uint8_t port,uint16_t vf, uint8_t on);
> rte_ethdev.h:rte_eth_dev_set_vf_vlan_filter(uint8_t port, uint16_t vlan_id,
>
> So do we have plan to move them or remove them as they are all for VF specifically?
I'm not very happy with these functions. I feel it's too specific because
only related to igb/ixgbe features.
We should try to isolate these things elsewhere. The ethdev API should be generic.
It's not the right time to debate about this but I'd like to have such cleanup in roadmap.
> If no, why we can accept those functions, but not accept the rte_eth_set_vf_rate_limit? :-)
Let's accept it while thinking together to a future nice cleanup.
--
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-10 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-26 7:45 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Support " Ouyang Changchun
2014-05-26 7:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] ether: Add API to support " Ouyang Changchun
2014-05-27 22:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-06-05 3:30 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2014-06-10 23:02 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2014-05-26 7:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] ixgbe: Implement the functionality of setting TX rate for queue or VF in IXGBE PMD Ouyang Changchun
2014-05-26 7:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] testpmd: Add commands to test the functionality of setting TX rate for queue or VF Ouyang Changchun
2014-05-26 22:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Support setting TX rate for queue and VF Neil Horman
2014-06-05 3:11 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2014-06-05 11:01 ` Neil Horman
[not found] ` <F52918179C57134FAEC9EA62FA2F9625117C89F0@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2014-06-05 5:32 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-06-05 12:41 ` Cao, Waterman
2014-06-06 6:52 ` Xie, Huawei
2014-06-11 14:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2006926.ZSHy59qidU@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=changchun.ouyang@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).