From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6CBC34E for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:45:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by widjy10 with SMTP id jy10so17463574wid.1 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:45:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=vqhlMMt+pMVV4GV7scMWH+yTMsuRa08V5npsEej4hX8=; b=Jn6TGY7aoNfshBI4Y2d4p+9cxebldpJqQSIhxAFgmJyk+6pAGR6yvWlmSytJwYnjsZ k5/J9AQOV4wjgnoNjjwTWVbvKIY+kYZYULW28HGJ+o5NgXF20JbOse+pw1Z2bVkCdyqO dOJfMo2ay6oNDhPkP1VoF2EhNLWp722/BFiRKOzw35YHESdMZ3hXPOi2Yq9JuzPRi3ZD ojezjXtPpiUbGEjzkVf2enkMcZuM1UZCFmrButm0uMD7jcWLFCaBzo0keG2m3lnT9/0y Rsk6VKKQ3LtzCs68KGSw+UhYioEAGNCZMZDReOqueutS2zI4FUGDEPb7Ko8eJ3qEFXJ8 /8bw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkqfudj43d9j9OxAZYt8Imq8L8PqhTvmdXxzgrptJgRcmTNnxOov+6RaXjZYaROMVrLN7Mj X-Received: by 10.180.86.163 with SMTP id q3mr6996826wiz.75.1436539503396; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ea2sm3236111wib.22.2015.07.10.07.45.01 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:45:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Simon Kagstrom Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:43:55 +0200 Message-ID: <2010129.FMfoz3DlDy@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <6445902.TI0hbQ8gWD@xps13> References: <20150527134524.5f107cac@miho> <6445902.TI0hbQ8gWD@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: Use utsrelease.h to determine Ubuntu kernel version X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:45:03 -0000 2015-06-16 23:09, Thomas Monjalon: > 2015-05-27 13:45, Simon Kagstrom: > > /proc/version_signature is the version for the host machine, but in > > e.g., chroots, this does not need to match that DPDK is built for. Use > > utsrelease.h from the kernel sources instead and fake the upload > > version. > > Sorry, I don't really understand the problem. > Do you mean that /proc/version_signature is not readable from the chroot? > Or do you mean that the /proc in the chroot is the host one and it > doesn't match the OS installed in the chroot? > > Please precise which case you try to solve and which tests you did > with which Ubuntu versions? The issue is still not clearly described. Closed in patchwork.