From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A446CD0 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:36:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id p65so88042365wmp.1 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:36:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K2MsfKb+2hcroyWIr8uz4TQUgqCy4XXXR4ozVVYffms=; b=SX52B8XyxAZWDfRpjPJNT8YyzFsyJzcI7k2nDaA8w2g6dK4Nt7x15vCNbv21U/9fRd KBpDeecR6LOKgZFjtyHFB8mWK2S/NHYQ6L8WmvRFTx8IYHRc923LL/L2EDvfFnaqJCu3 YAYXtGAjsuxtts9HoAvpYeD0HSGuraKtc2fFnMxth46KCQ6If9Z2QKMUskglZE88Sy9I I1xc6Z0svmjw/45HZNODUaoOIjUF/omOCx2zgq78w/GCfKQOvKEoD8Ce0JTLEVwp2cSe yWGX1H376MuF1uNtAbGWrlGs7fzvOgL6y1jHveNKfWPG9wc2OpKTWckZ4RpWrdu5gM2B uiLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=K2MsfKb+2hcroyWIr8uz4TQUgqCy4XXXR4ozVVYffms=; b=Uj6vcrmYA+TdVkZz7hk66ksrps4l3+r38mpNUcoxMw1u/E9v06jh1+uoMpXJ4VfPNn JI+2ptu7KhWPYuAlhsir42/iPPLgQrHc4tbDO3Tv5nzbFSBaJPzrL2XJjdsxobZEVj56 rp64TtHnCvr7ziLbMWyYbCkjA9motQn3p4fz9TkPtn2sYmim8bFVang57mFYPgmSbYGU nIe7US3Os5gwHFZlD31XMOqwaPz8+EuBHY0hyXz3v9bg2CBG7+t6Wb1+TzGf7UCYjO0z W7wSi5tm0Npx+nDxNl3AiJ0hWz2Ti8S/KBrSokLQ3m9V1LP1yVwTMXoM+WEK8JPf1i7r VlSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJieDU3gEo2ni2mCis3UL3T2SA77EJUzfDzshL7j74EMgH3V3C1yW4zIbwuf3+np7Zo X-Received: by 10.28.187.134 with SMTP id l128mr810286wmf.61.1456936616884; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:36:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id za6sm36622405wjc.18.2016.03.02.08.36.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:36:55 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Kobylinski, MichalX" Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 17:35:20 +0100 Message-ID: <2011283.cuAp1JmmEa@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <987EE72691933347B9F0B5C19E71B5BB1F04159F@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1454069573-12059-1-git-send-email-michalx.kobylinski@intel.com> <2044358.OMRF2VQKlE@xps13> <987EE72691933347B9F0B5C19E71B5BB1F04159F@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] lpm: extend ip4 next_hop and add config structure X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:36:57 -0000 2016-03-02 16:23, Kobylinski, MichalX: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 4:29 PM > > Is it possible to split the changes in next_hop and config structure? > > It is possible. Do you mean to put config structure into seperate patch-set? If it makes sense, yes. I don't know how strongly the changes are tied. If possible, it's better to have progressive changes to make the patches easier to understand.