From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-x22b.google.com (mail-pb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22b]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68166A96 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 18:15:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id md12so2898512pbc.30 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 09:15:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=sUsFIP79lArjoqpwOVPihAxwd/xxTQ4LCXscR35AOq8=; b=R1wEoznjsNxn4LWAJ6YSPUSn3n95MC3+GbEZnnOZvwM/uXdGiunbL82JHVUpA/p81C MWJj8+zmhAiPwf59psrO9kIcbxQW6W85NnRNxmvRghtrBHswDcyV5d6KBqUHB7we8g/z +E41Ll/LTHOreeCnZsoib1wNouOxL9C8K6deLXYbReE2AIhlLd0a3kCp3hky49sM4PQD 1y11BBR9VktgRPPt9QZ5lIt8Pr+h9XT+S4XObDQNwk0J0iLCL2qECLfOLcr1pV4ActHq Im5hHH3XawvJbHkYlVMTjyxE4OB1Jopjlm1Yi0csCz8l6DgdvOPIBgNE4/aif4AiJh7g GQEw== X-Received: by 10.66.27.197 with SMTP id v5mr18323123pag.211.1368202553529; Fri, 10 May 2013 09:15:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net (static-50-53-71-109.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.71.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vz8sm3452157pac.20.2013.05.10.09.15.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 May 2013 09:15:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 09:15:49 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Bhavesh Davda Message-ID: <20130510091549.3c064df6@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> In-Reply-To: <1676591087.5291867.1368201908283.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> References: <1676591087.5291867.1368201908283.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlkxQewrF04kn3XO4xnOa+wPJSYOYtMb6SkxW5nxCvtFjWuFJ/r65XzKNKrZF9Hh8aB6rcL Cc: Henry Wang , dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_eth_dev_count() returns 0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 16:15:53 -0000 On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:05:08 -0700 (PDT) Bhavesh Davda wrote: > ESXi 5.0 doesn't have SR-IOV support (it's in the code, but is disabled and not usable for customers). VMware introduced SR-IOV support, including out of the box support for Intel Niantic 10GbE NICs, in ESXi 5.1. > You can use PCI passthrough (Directpath) on 5.0 (and 5.1). I found that SR-IOV on Vmware is even more fussy than SR-IOV on Linux. It requires a supported platform with VT-d and PCIe ASPM.