From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03EF6A9E for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 20:45:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id fa10so3143007pad.19 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:45:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=8JydxChKHj28ARLCDBWpPGWpzJQlqyfG/8Xdy5u8Vro=; b=dFG5ic+1mGQRdIKxPRmKK7GhS7xQEMGKMBCgdO8Oj3e2+lwsYn9XQbA6vqe9FSEbep 0xtifoD0VYnIy2P6oLMzJmv42q1kfRM9HXz6cDt0wVBlxSiWoj7moaU4NQkBAZ14/OtQ 0foEc045ku9V2vrtNa4ApIh3eXsQNXbPhoRYdnZFGXzBmobeKuWcEuVxABfJ02LmjJQF SAngdJSGNh02svExtr5qFEU4Zb9TjKohdl29dfhgWCfp0Xi0TTX7F59LY9PcXEY5TWGD oVvxgkfNKXJQGOIS7dbrDexioDeXi4NA9x3IdySOGIRvYhBOAdgnidVjidEnTumHM7Sv QTDA== X-Received: by 10.68.172.36 with SMTP id az4mr18315911pbc.211.1368211510946; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net (static-50-53-71-109.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.71.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id zo4sm3619694pbc.21.2013.05.10.11.45.09 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 May 2013 11:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:50 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Bhavesh Davda Message-ID: <20130510114450.7104c5d2@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> In-Reply-To: <525534677.5312512.1368202896189.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> References: <1676591087.5291867.1368201908283.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> <20130510091549.3c064df6@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <525534677.5312512.1368202896189.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlGKGWW2vlkIX60nZl5kB3zRtXLuUNmaFqVNZOIoGBPOtrVn/efZsJyFXXKtwXMxv2s4I3s Cc: Henry Wang , dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_eth_dev_count() returns 0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 18:45:11 -0000 On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Bhavesh Davda wrote: > Right: VMware has supported VMDirectPath passthrough since ESXi 4.0, on any platform with an IOMMU (Intel VT-d) which is anything Nehalem Xeons or newer. > > I know this is a DPDK forum, but Stephen, if you know of specific limitations of ESXi 5.1's SR-IOV support, please let me know and I'll make sure we work on addressing them. I had trouble getting it to work on a white box ASUS motherboard. It seems the MB didn't support PCIe power management ASPM. And Intel confirmed that was required by Vmware. Linux didn't care if ASPM wasn't available and worked fine with SR-IOV.