From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib: set version 1.2.3r2 and more helper macros
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 16:46:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201305171646.00572.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5195F477.1050501@6wind.com>
17/05/2013 11:12, Olivier MATZ :
> > @@ -75,7 +87,8 @@ rte_version(void) {
> >
> > return RTE_VER_PREFIX" "
> >
> > RTE_STR(RTE_VER_MAJOR)"."
> > RTE_STR(RTE_VER_MINOR)"."
> >
> > - RTE_STR(RTE_VER_PATCH_LEVEL);
> > + RTE_STR(RTE_VER_PATCH_LEVEL)"r"
> > + RTE_STR(RTE_VER_PATCH_RELEASE);
> >
> > }
>
> In this patch, do you think it could be useful to add
> a #ifdef RTE_VER_PATCH_RELEASE ? The idea is to return
> "1.2.3" if there is no patch release and "1.2.3r4" in
> the dpdk.org case. As a result this patch would be integrable
> in Intel DPDK mainline.
This patch introduce RTE_VER_PATCH_RELEASE so #ifdef RTE_VER_PATCH_RELEASE is
always true. I don't see why a commercial version of the DPDK would like to
apply part of this patch.
--
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-17 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-07 15:30 Thomas Monjalon
2013-05-17 9:12 ` Olivier MATZ
2013-05-17 14:46 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2013-05-17 15:02 ` Olivier MATZ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201305171646.00572.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).