From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0C6532D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:39:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a12so5035403wgh.4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 06:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=google.com; s=20120113;
 h=from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references
 :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
 :message-id:x-gm-message-state;
 bh=3We9YABDPqjV8JIj+vQEuQY3016uL+VgBPAbuPx3YkM=;
 b=TAE/dD5xFrGmf/e5DQgSIVnZEfBAPIFZXcVnuxihM2o1p1In8QmJV7mp5fDR78LtlY
 +vEzjzbY1CGRYLL2DNpu3oGxV0nXxog6fAZ0aPmy5cqCSr+N8zU/GJaZ91n12cwtzqK3
 qTVFd2ztaO7x+Q3rgacucBKbLkGgHGleC99qTmDdXKlhkuzxY6lpXAD6LwVFGv9SyVA3
 o96JiyCEKxwhgXAhroyhOHhYI+wCLxmdGV/srlO6dkz4HD1WPbJQB0A9yNEuczfJrJDn
 BVrnUrb0vByS2NCCew6IDUeFnP8ksmG1g8WLZO9+FF9HOb38viJF2PKZ91C6gji80mm2
 jh1A==
X-Received: by 10.194.89.39 with SMTP id bl7mr9720754wjb.15.1371044388486;
 Wed, 12 Jun 2013 06:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from angus.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dz8sm3478942wib.11.2013.06.12.06.39.46
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Wed, 12 Jun 2013 06:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Organization: 6WIND
To: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:39:49 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <tencent_32A472FE12E181E41F4C6C1C@qq.com>
In-Reply-To: <tencent_32A472FE12E181E41F4C6C1C@qq.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201306121539.49552.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTajxuVnuyuvorLUc+7VsanRLIH7VVdulsspj3rzF+sO5sRf4UOHLUjkRM0qYgO9sEMVIA
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Can the empty struct rte_eth_txmode be enhanced?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:39:39 -0000

12/06/2013 14:23, lxu :
> Great! Thanks for the quick feedback.
> 
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> From:  "Olivier MATZ"<olivier.matz@6wind.com>;
>
> I agree with your solution. Do you approve the following patch ?
> 
> From: lxu <lxu4net@qq.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:32:30 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] ethdev: force the size of struct rte_eth_txmode to be 0

applied, thanks

-- 
Thomas