From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC0B232
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:33:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p58so2170354wes.12
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=google.com; s=20120113;
 h=from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references
 :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
 :message-id:x-gm-message-state;
 bh=HfihvfiMJoFvZf44NjVIt6NLbIXh2V7vWGD+qSEXfYQ=;
 b=EOhbvyP52rtWzK3z5cIDL8aVXjz/kusxbY0WaZXm2IMXglukNGGGW28eNUZ1Usn7a7
 cRpNaZVMZ6h3SxEZwdNZnFrxCGf3zxUUDpU//qcxoSm5q123TBSXk2Y9MviXFHGW8Mw5
 qgPX6psyCHuF8HysKdEiw8CTgfXIl/NJUeSsNib9wFArgmkoy72EcW0YseD2mbWT/mUP
 4PgCwRA0E34YKvPdx+17SD8/Q+nVFoN9ja/pOVNvSUGN/zbHG+Lwqw7mLV/HmmEFHCSv
 9YsbefWa6sGRBGjRi1zQ1UJroRVqQjAzFOnQelpjOndbGWuepmnkEu6ziKWcuA+a5WqI
 5O3w==
X-Received: by 10.180.185.225 with SMTP id ff1mr4325235wic.36.1371461619920;
 Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from angus.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fv11sm20715837wic.11.2013.06.17.02.33.38
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Organization: 6WIND
To: Patrick Mahan <mahan@mahan.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:33:41 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <51BAA6BB.20107@mahan.org>
 <20130614075736.5f0e4752@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130614075736.5f0e4752@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201306171133.41185.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcVDNqXCsONYq1RiP2FB708dacjpJWv6VLvIwTOALVeeQoS5vwPRzKZmxqOIIpvqo1aDfN
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] link_status_interrupt fails
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:33:29 -0000

14/06/2013 16:57, Stephen Hemminger :
> Patrick Mahan <mahan@mahan.org> wrote:
> > I am seeing the following issue with the link_status example.  This
> > requires a reboot on my testbox.
> 
> This is an example of why I posted the RFC patch to igb_uio to not use
> pci_lock. -
> Subject: igb_uio: rework interrupt usin intx_mask

Patrick,

Do you confirm that Stephen's patch is solving your problem ?

-- 
Thomas