DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zengxg14 <zengxg14@gmail.com>
To: "jinho hwang" <hwang.jinho@gmail.com>,  dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 1 core / 1 port receiving performance discrepancy
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:51:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201307131351011854082@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPQGAnGQdpo4ZkKO5sQzHYtTFj3EphzPyakCJaSuHFHHR_UUOg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1052 bytes --]

Hi:

What is your burst size in rte_eth_rx_burst?
Can you provide the shell command you run, both test-pmd and your code?






From: jinho hwang
Date: 2013-07-12 23:46
To: dev
Subject: [dpdk-dev] 1 core / 1 port receiving performance discrepancy
Hi Guys,

I am currently testing my code with two machines(X5650 @ 2.67GHz,
82599EB): one runs my code, and the other runs Pktgen. The first task
is to see how my code performs comparing to test-pmd. Both use only
one port with one core to receive packets. test-pmd uses rxonly mode.
My code only receives packets and discards them right away, and there
are no other processing at all. Different from what I expected,
test-pmd shows 33M packets (do not count on the second --- just total
number of packets sent from Pktgen), whereas mine shows 18M packets
with the same traffic.

I have tried to configure many things such as increasing rx queue
size, increasing max packet receive buffer, but the number did not
make differences.

Can I get some help?

Thank you,

Jinho

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3275 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2013-07-13  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-12 15:46 jinho hwang
2013-07-13  5:51 ` zengxg14 [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201307131351011854082@gmail.com \
    --to=zengxg14@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hwang.jinho@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).