From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019D32A7 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 07:50:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id rl6so9671620pac.15 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 22:51:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:reply-to:subject:references:x-priority:x-has-attach :x-mailer:mime-version:message-id:content-type; bh=9hSOv13tVd7DVPINFB9SjqRfxoAEwFRgLKCnpEaGDQM=; b=fTe61rU19BYvDdWCdBgEtdXUG3I9X6u1l91A0BVN3hSbd3JTtP6uJPjkzn9sJ7zPbH +DMFs4mnBrkAa7j/8pw+1lw39zEAplfszHk82QfNB3dYUqteAiEUuUbHO5OAkSd3P+1X UJcMZ1RaqIistwghlmvQGNQTba4D7oQ8B/zBt+n4FcZwhaiO5Zsi0xdekcDgk/btJqrw 2C+YJQJ3CNyJ1ZzO9SV8o/AsA1BTa5DJ8OwqO3airSpe6hUd4NhQMRQpdzishSZ3RdX1 cLVVjdgCxVEzI0V6pashVL+KN/6HZXiPmlYKZAShyAtaHVVE1JDzpg0YyqokdhI2HqAq ZORQ== X-Received: by 10.66.144.199 with SMTP id so7mr45877399pab.99.1373694675105; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 22:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zxg-PC ([106.120.176.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm48870464pbw.32.2013.07.12.22.51.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 22:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:51:10 +0800 From: zengxg14 To: "jinho hwang" , dev References: X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.91[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <201307131351011854082@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart286070380570_=----" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 1 core / 1 port receiving performance discrepancy X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: zengxg14 List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 05:50:57 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_001_NextPart286070380570_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGk6DQoNCldoYXQgaXMgeW91ciBidXJzdCBzaXplIGluIHJ0ZV9ldGhfcnhfYnVyc3Q/DQpDYW4g eW91IHByb3ZpZGUgdGhlIHNoZWxsIGNvbW1hbmQgeW91IHJ1biwgYm90aCB0ZXN0LXBtZCBhbmQg eW91ciBjb2RlPw0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KRnJvbTogamluaG8gaHdhbmcNCkRhdGU6IDIwMTMtMDct MTIgMjM6NDYNClRvOiBkZXYNClN1YmplY3Q6IFtkcGRrLWRldl0gMSBjb3JlIC8gMSBwb3J0IHJl Y2VpdmluZyBwZXJmb3JtYW5jZSBkaXNjcmVwYW5jeQ0KSGkgR3V5cywNCg0KSSBhbSBjdXJyZW50 bHkgdGVzdGluZyBteSBjb2RlIHdpdGggdHdvIG1hY2hpbmVzKFg1NjUwIEAgMi42N0dIeiwNCjgy NTk5RUIpOiBvbmUgcnVucyBteSBjb2RlLCBhbmQgdGhlIG90aGVyIHJ1bnMgUGt0Z2VuLiBUaGUg Zmlyc3QgdGFzaw0KaXMgdG8gc2VlIGhvdyBteSBjb2RlIHBlcmZvcm1zIGNvbXBhcmluZyB0byB0 ZXN0LXBtZC4gQm90aCB1c2Ugb25seQ0Kb25lIHBvcnQgd2l0aCBvbmUgY29yZSB0byByZWNlaXZl IHBhY2tldHMuIHRlc3QtcG1kIHVzZXMgcnhvbmx5IG1vZGUuDQpNeSBjb2RlIG9ubHkgcmVjZWl2 ZXMgcGFja2V0cyBhbmQgZGlzY2FyZHMgdGhlbSByaWdodCBhd2F5LCBhbmQgdGhlcmUNCmFyZSBu byBvdGhlciBwcm9jZXNzaW5nIGF0IGFsbC4gRGlmZmVyZW50IGZyb20gd2hhdCBJIGV4cGVjdGVk LA0KdGVzdC1wbWQgc2hvd3MgMzNNIHBhY2tldHMgKGRvIG5vdCBjb3VudCBvbiB0aGUgc2Vjb25k IC0tLSBqdXN0IHRvdGFsDQpudW1iZXIgb2YgcGFja2V0cyBzZW50IGZyb20gUGt0Z2VuKSwgd2hl cmVhcyBtaW5lIHNob3dzIDE4TSBwYWNrZXRzDQp3aXRoIHRoZSBzYW1lIHRyYWZmaWMuDQoNCkkg aGF2ZSB0cmllZCB0byBjb25maWd1cmUgbWFueSB0aGluZ3Mgc3VjaCBhcyBpbmNyZWFzaW5nIHJ4 IHF1ZXVlDQpzaXplLCBpbmNyZWFzaW5nIG1heCBwYWNrZXQgcmVjZWl2ZSBidWZmZXIsIGJ1dCB0 aGUgbnVtYmVyIGRpZCBub3QNCm1ha2UgZGlmZmVyZW5jZXMuDQoNCkNhbiBJIGdldCBzb21lIGhl bHA/DQoNClRoYW5rIHlvdSwNCg0KSmluaG8= ------=_001_NextPart286070380570_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Hi:
 
What is your burst size in rte_eth_rx_burst?
Can you provide the shell command you run, both test-pmd and you= r=20 code?
 
 

 
Date: 2013-07-12 23:46
To: dev
Subject: [dpdk-dev] 1 core / 1 port receiving performance= =20 discrepancy
Hi Guys,
 
I am currently testing my code with&nbs= p;two machines(X5650 @ 2.67GHz,
82599EB): one runs my code, and the&nbs= p;other runs Pktgen. The first task
is to see how my code performs com= paring to test-pmd. Both use only
one port with one core to receive = packets. test-pmd uses rxonly mode.
My code only receives packets and disca= rds them right away, and there
are no other processing at all. Differe= nt from what I expected,
test-pmd shows 33M packets (do not coun= t on the second --- just total
number of packets sent from Pktgen), wh= ereas mine shows 18M packets
with the same traffic.
 
I have tried to configure many things&n= bsp;such as increasing rx queue
size, increasing max packet receive buffer,&= nbsp;but the number did not
make differences.
 
Can I get some help?
 
Thank you,
 
Jinho
------=_001_NextPart286070380570_=------