From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Marc Sune <marc.sune@bisdn.de>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Non-argv dependant rte_eal_init() call
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 18:01:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201308011801.08070.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51FA80BF.2020801@bisdn.de>
Hello,
01/08/2013 17:37, Marc Sune :
> In our case, we are right now simply faking the argv, which is a little
> bit ugly:
> <code>
> //...
> 37 const char* argv[EAL_ARGS] = {"./fake", "-c",CORE_MASK,
> "-n",NUM_CACHE_LINES, ""};
> //...
> 53 ret = rte_eal_init(EAL_ARGS, (char**)argv);
> 54 if (ret < 0)
> 55 rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "rte_eal_init failed");
> //...
> </code>
You should provide a better binary name because in your example, your logs
will be prefixed with "fake" which is, I agree with you, a little bit ugly ;)
> IMHO it would make more sense to have actually two calls, adding a
> library-like initialization. Something like:
>
> <code>
> /*
> * In the comments a warning that this should be called at the very
> beginning of the program.
> *...
> */
> int rte_eal_init(eal_coremask_t core_mask, unsigned int num_of_lines
> /*More parameters here...*/);
>
> /*
> *
> */
> int rte_eal_init_argv(int argc, char **argv);
>
> </code>
The problem with your proposal is that the number of options is static.
So when adding a new option in future releases, all the applications should be
updated to give a (probably null) value for this new option.
Not sure it is an improvement.
> Btw, the same applies to the mangling of the main() (MAIN) routine. Is
> this really necessary? Isn't it enough to clearly state in the
> documentation that certain API calls need to be made on the very
> beginning of the application?
Not sure to understand this point.
MAIN is only defined in examples for the bare-metal use case.
What is the link with the API ?
--
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-01 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-01 15:37 Marc Sune
2013-08-01 16:01 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2013-08-01 16:13 ` Marc Sune
2013-08-01 16:47 ` Antti Kantee
2013-08-01 18:14 ` Marc Sune
2013-08-01 17:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-08-01 18:17 ` Marc Sune
2013-08-01 19:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-08-01 20:22 ` Balazs Nemeth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201308011801.08070.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=marc.sune@bisdn.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).